Back to live profile
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
ISSUE SIGNAL REPORTAV-ER-0YM83FVGenerated September 12, 2026Evidence checked Sep 11, 2026
ISSUE SIGNAL REPORT

Fake Citations

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records1,726
Source linked99.9%
Known amount total$1,723,681
Recorded rangeApr 14, 2023 Sep 9, 2026
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

Where does Fake Citations appear and what responses are recorded?

Taxonomy definition: Authorities or citations recorded as nonexistent, inaccurate, or not locatable in the cited form.

AI Vortex currently links 1,726 source-linked public matters classified with Fake Citations. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (1,726), Misrepresented authority (724) and Fabricated or altered quotations (543). Recorded responses and outcomes include Warning or admonishment (561), No adjudicated consequence recorded (541) and Monetary sanction (391). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the failure.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.
UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 1,726
Sep 9, 2026Beus Gilbert PLLC v. Brigham Young University et al.D. UtahClearBrief, Claude, ChatGPT, and GeminiSource
Sep 8, 2026Asiedu v. EastlundCA MinnesotaUnidentifiedSource
Sep 8, 2026G.P. v. Jose Hernandez ArevaloW.D. WashingtonAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Sep 8, 2026Philippeaux v. United States, et al.S.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Sep 3, 2026Douglas v. Deutsche Bank National Trust CompanyD.C. Court of AppealsGoogle AISource
Sep 3, 2026Santos v. Hoboken Public School District, et al.D. New JerseyAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Sep 2, 2026Morgan Cole v. Hobby Town Unlimited, Inc.C.D. IllinoisAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Sep 2, 2026Vijay Ghanshyam Gadiya v. Union of India & Anr.Supreme Court of IndiaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Sep 1, 2026Willie C. Fortune v. CTA Certified TransmissionMissouri CAAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Sep 1, 2026Woodley v. GottschallSC PennsylvaniaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Aug 31, 2026Fleming v. The Owners, Strata Plan LMS 4383CRT British ColumbiaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Open all matching records
EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.