AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 26, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 23, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesChilingarian v. Blanche
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 70/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Chilingarian v. Blanche

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

10th Cir. CA · Oct 20, 2026

/ federalEditorial impact: lowfake citationsfabricated quotesimmigrationappellateNone Adjudicated
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | The brief cited Naranjo Garcia v. Garland, a case the court determined does not exist. The matter is recorded in 10th Cir. CA on 2026-10-20 and concerns fake citations and fabricated quotes. The tracked outcome is the procedural response described in the linked source; consult the linked source for the complete record.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with a recorded judicial or procedural response in 10th Cir. CA. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | The brief cited Naranjo Garcia v. Garland, a case the court determined does not exist. The matter is recorded in 10th Cir. CA on 2026-10-20 and concerns fake citations and fabricated quotes. The tracked outcome is the procedural response described in the linked source; consult the linked source for the complete record.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with a recorded judicial or procedural response in 10th Cir. CA. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

Court10th Cir. CA
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit10th Circuit
DateOct 20, 2026
NO
AI toolNo tool named in source
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeSee source
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | The brief cited Naranjo Garcia v. Garland, a case the court determined does not exist.
  2. False Quotes: Case Law | The brief attributed the statement that it violates “the most elementary notions of due process” to Goldberg v. Kelly, but the quoted language does not appear at the cited pages.
  3. Fabricated: Case Law | The brief cited Sameeh v. Gonzales, a case the court determined does not exist.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Chilingarian v. Blanche?
Fabricated: Case Law | The brief cited Naranjo Garcia v. Garland, a case the court determined does not exist. The matter is recorded in 10th Cir. CA on 2026-10-20 and concerns fake citations and fabricated quotes. The tracked outcome is the procedural response described in the linked source; consult the linked source for the complete record.
Why does Chilingarian v. Blanche matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with a recorded judicial or procedural response in 10th Cir. CA. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Chilingarian v. Blanche?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Chilingarian v. Blanche summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Martha Liliana Picon-Diaz et al. v. Pamela J. Bondi10th Cir. CA · Feb 13, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesChapter Kris Jackson v. Santander Consumer USA Inc., et al.10th Cir. CA · Jun 15, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesRyan-Michael Jarvis v. County of Teton Wyoming10th Cir. CA · Apr 24, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesKevin Lee Biglow v. Dell Technologies Inc.10th Cir. CA · Mar 24, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesFlora Chumpitaz-Morales v. Pamela J. Bondi10th Cir. CA · Feb 11, 2026same court · fake citations + immigrationThomas Carl Dodds, Jr. v. Carrie Bridges10th Cir. CA · Feb 11, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes
Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.