STATE EVIDENCE REPORT

Iowa

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records14

Source linked100%

Known USD amount total$150

Recorded rangeJan 2, 2025 – Oct 7, 2026

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What patterns appear in the public records associated with Iowa?

AI Vortex currently links 14 source-linked public matters associated with Iowa. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (14), Misrepresented authority (4) and Fabricated or altered quotations (3). Recorded responses and outcomes include Warning or admonishment (5), No adjudicated consequence recorded (4) and Filing or pleading struck (3). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the state.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.

OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Fabricated authorities14 · 100%Misrepresented authority4 · 28.6%Fabricated or altered quotations3 · 21.4%

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.

RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

Warning or admonishment5 · 35.7%No adjudicated consequence recorded4 · 28.6%Filing or pleading struck3 · 21.4%Professional discipline2 · 14.3%Bar or professional referral1 · 7.1%Dismissal or adverse disposition1 · 7.1%

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

Pro Se Litigant11 · 78.6%Lawyer3 · 21.4%

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

Family5 · 35.7%Contract3 · 21.4%Administrative1 · 7.1%Civil Rights1 · 7.1%Other1 · 7.1%

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 14

Oct 7, 2026Tapscott v. FarissCA IowaAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Aug 19, 2026Wilkinson v. SchmelzerCA IowaAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Jun 10, 2026State of Iowa ex rel J.G. v. Mynesia A. AndersonCA IowaAI (implied, unspecified)Source

May 27, 2026Christ Apostolic Temple, Inc., Dwight Reed and Jordan Reed v. Demetrius Sinegal, et al.CA IowaAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Apr 30, 2026Burnside v. Verdick, et al.S.D. IowaAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Apr 29, 2026Nisland Asset Investment, LLC v. Carissa Ann GerickeCA IowaAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Apr 1, 2026In the Interest of W.G., Minor ChildCA IowaPerplexitySource

Oct 31, 2025Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Richard Louis Pazdernik, Jr.Iowa SC Attorney Disciplinary BoardChatGPTSource

Oct 1, 2025In the Interest of R.A.CA IowaUnidentifiedSource

Sep 4, 2025April Ann Nelson v. Navient Solutions, LLC, et al.S.D. IowaAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Sep 4, 2025Turner v. GarrelsCA IowaAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Aug 6, 2025Luke v. Iowa DHHSCA IowaNo tool named in sourceSource

Open all matching records

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.

CONNECTED INTELLIGENCE

Related corpus profiles

Fake Citations14 shared records United States14 shared records CA Iowa9 shared records Warning5 shared records Misrepresented Authority4 shared records None Adjudicated4 shared records

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, Iowa Evidence Report, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Oct. 26, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/states/ia/report (last visited Oct. 26, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, October 26). Iowa Evidence Report. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved October 26, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/states/ia/report
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/states/ia/report (accessed 2026-10-26)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.