HomeCasesIn the Interest of W.G., Minor Child

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

In the Interest of W.G., Minor Child

CA Iowa · Apr 1, 2026

IA / stateEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsmisrepresented authorityfamily

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Misrepresented: Case Law | AI attributed specific propositions of law to a cited case where those propositions did not appear (misattribution of holdings/authority).

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is the response recorded in the linked source; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Perplexity with a recorded judicial response in CA Iowa, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Misrepresented: Case Law | AI attributed specific propositions of law to a cited case where those propositions did not appear (misattribution of holdings/authority).

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Perplexity with a recorded judicial response in CA Iowa, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

IowaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtCA Iowa

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit8th Circuit

DateApr 1, 2026

AI toolPerplexity

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

Perplexity is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Misrepresented: Case Law | AI attributed specific propositions of law to a cited case where those propositions did not appear (misattribution of holdings/authority).
Fabricated: Case Law | Petition included at least one citation to a nonexistent Iowa appellate decision; court found citation was fabricated and ordered disclosure.

Questions this record answers

What happened in In the Interest of W.G., Minor Child?: Misrepresented: Case Law | AI attributed specific propositions of law to a cited case where those propositions did not appear (misattribution of holdings/authority).
Why does In the Interest of W.G., Minor Child matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Perplexity with a recorded judicial response in CA Iowa, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about In the Interest of W.G., Minor Child?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this In the Interest of W.G., Minor Child summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

State of Iowa ex rel J.G. v. Mynesia A. AndersonCA Iowa · Jun 10, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Christ Apostolic Temple, Inc., Dwight Reed and Jordan Reed v. Demetrius Sinegal, et al.CA Iowa · May 27, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Nisland Asset Investment, LLC v. Carissa Ann GerickeCA Iowa · Apr 29, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Turner v. GarrelsCA Iowa · Sep 4, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Luke v. Iowa DHHSCA Iowa · Aug 6, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations In the Interest of R.A.CA Iowa · Oct 1, 2025same court · fake citations + appellate

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Misrepresented: Case Law | AI attributed specific propositions of law to a cited case where those propositions did not appear (misattribution of holdings/authority).

Operational lesson

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Misrepresented: Case Law | AI attributed specific propositions of law to a cited case where those propositions did not appear (misattribution of holdings/authority).

Fabricated: Case Law | Petition included at least one citation to a nonexistent Iowa appellate decision; court found citation was fabricated and ordered disclosure.

Questions this record answers

What happened in In the Interest of W.G., Minor Child?

Misrepresented: Case Law | AI attributed specific propositions of law to a cited case where those propositions did not appear (misattribution of holdings/authority).

Why does In the Interest of W.G., Minor Child matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about In the Interest of W.G., Minor Child?

Which source supports this In the Interest of W.G., Minor Child summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.