Back to live profile
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
STATE EVIDENCE REPORTAV-ER-1SU5CO7Generated October 27, 2026Evidence checked Oct 26, 2026
STATE EVIDENCE REPORT

Pennsylvania

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records46
Source linked100%
Known USD amount total$17,500
Recorded rangeFeb 27, 2025 – Oct 19, 2026
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What patterns appear in the public records associated with Pennsylvania?

AI Vortex currently links 46 source-linked public matters associated with Pennsylvania. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (35), Misrepresented authority (27) and Fabricated or altered quotations (17). Recorded responses and outcomes include No adjudicated consequence recorded (16), Warning or admonishment (16) and Monetary sanction (5). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the state.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.
OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.
RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.
PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 46
Oct 19, 2026Commonwealth v. ButlerSC PennsylvaniaNo tool named in sourceSource
Oct 14, 2026Sabatini v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionC. PennsylvaniaNo tool named in sourceSource
Sep 18, 2026Whitfield v. Prime AgencyE.D. PennsylvaniaNo tool named in sourceSource
Sep 15, 2026Bell v. City of Clairton et al.W.D. PennsylvaniaLexis AISource
Sep 9, 2026Pennmark Coventry Holdings, LLC v. Kohl’s Department Stores, Inc.E.D. PennsylvaniaNo tool named in sourceSource
Sep 1, 2026Woodley v. GottschallSC PennsylvaniaUnidentifiedSource
Aug 27, 2026Paige Kiser & Ty Kiser v. DeSimone Auto Group et al.SC PennsylvaniaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Aug 19, 2026Zoryana Kaspryak v. Mykhaylo StadarskyySC PennsylvaniaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Aug 12, 2026Davenport v. Churilla et alW.D. PennsylvaniaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Aug 11, 2026Courtney Voyton v. Joseph Voyton, et al.M.D. PennsylvaniaUnidentifiedSource
Aug 3, 2026Bisher v. Civic, et al.SC PennsylvaniaNo tool named in sourceSource
Jul 23, 2026Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. KardoshE.D. PennsylvaniaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Open all matching records
EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.

Cite this page

Bluebook

AI Vortex, Pennsylvania Evidence Report, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Oct. 26, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/states/pa/report (last visited Oct. 26, 2026).

APA

AI Vortex. (2026, October 26). Pennsylvania Evidence Report. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved October 26, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/states/pa/report

URL

https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/states/pa/report (accessed 2026-10-26)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.