Back to live profile
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
STATE EVIDENCE REPORTAV-ER-1SU5CO7Generated September 12, 2026Evidence checked Sep 11, 2026
STATE EVIDENCE REPORT

Pennsylvania

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records40
Source linked100%
Known amount total$17,500
Recorded rangeFeb 27, 2025 Sep 1, 2026
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What patterns appear in the public records associated with Pennsylvania?

AI Vortex currently links 40 source-linked public matters associated with Pennsylvania. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (31), Misrepresented authority (21) and Fabricated or altered quotations (13). Recorded responses and outcomes include Warning or admonishment (16), No adjudicated consequence recorded (12) and Monetary sanction (5). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the state.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.
OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.
RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.
PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 40
Sep 1, 2026Woodley v. GottschallSC PennsylvaniaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Aug 27, 2026Paige Kiser & Ty Kiser v. DeSimone Auto Group et al.SC PennsylvaniaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Aug 19, 2026Zoryana Kaspryak v. Mykhaylo StadarskyySC PennsylvaniaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Aug 12, 2026Davenport v. Churilla et alW.D. PennsylvaniaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Aug 11, 2026Courtney Voyton v. Joseph Voyton, et al.M.D. PennsylvaniaUnidentifiedSource
Aug 3, 2026Bisher v. Civic, et al.SC PennsylvaniaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jul 23, 2026Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. KardoshE.D. PennsylvaniaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jul 10, 2026Birsingh v. Little Wheel, LLC, et al.M.D. PennsylvaniaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jun 9, 2026Casey A. Gaddy v. Wood Brothers Bar, Inc., et al.E.D. PennsylvaniaUnidentifiedSource
May 29, 2026Jaclyn Cocco v. Rosario Palmieri, Jr.SC PennsylvaniaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Open all matching records
EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.