You have the tools. How much of the work is actually supported? Map your firm's governance, infrastructure, workflow, and compliance practices—and choose what to improve next.
12 questions · About 2 minutes · No email required
Start your assessment ↓How scoring worksWho decides, owns, and reviews?
Can the work survive a handoff?
Where does human judgment stay?
What can your team demonstrate?
The useful next step is something your team can show: a named owner, a documented workflow, a review record. Start with the lowest dimension and test one improvement before expanding.
Get the workflow playbook →
A separate question: AI visibility. This assessment covers how your firm uses AI. The Visibility Diagnostic examines how AI search represents your firm to potential clients.
This is an AI Vortex planning framework, not an audit, certification, or ranking against other firms. It uses your answers only. It does not inspect your systems, documents, or legal compliance.
Two profile questions provide context. Ten scored questions contribute to four dimensions. Each dimension receives a level from 1 to 5; the overall level is their average, rounded down.
| Dimension | L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Governance (Q1–3) | 0–1 | 2–3 | 4–5 | 6–7 | 8–9 |
| Infrastructure (Q4–5) | 0–1 | 2 | 3–4 | 5–6 | 7 |
| Workflow (Q6–7) | 0–1 | 2 | 3–4 | 5–6 | 7–8 |
| Compliance (Q8–10) | 0–1 | 2–3 | 4–5 | 6–8 | 9–10 |
Answers stay in this page's memory. Shared result links contain the four levels, but not your answers or firm profile. Anyone with the link can view those levels. Standard site analytics may record page visits.
I'm Manu Ayala. I spent five years doing legal investigations for a US law firm. Now I run AI Vortex, where I help firms figure out where they actually stand on AI and build the infrastructure to get to where they need to be. I write about what I find at aivortex.io/legal.