This page lists 6 corrections that changed 255 pages on this site. Every affected page carries the same entry in a Corrections block near the bottom, and the page data names it in a correction property. The log begins with the corrections of October 20 and 22, 2026; earlier fixes are not listed here.

Found something wrong? Use the correction form or write to manuel@aivortex.io. We check the claim against a primary source, change the page if it holds up, and add it here with the date.

Wording about our reading process removed

· 107 pages

What changed

  • Rewrote wording that described our own research process. Sections that used to carry a note about our own checking now read "Before you rely on this" or "Open questions" and speak to the reader. (107 pages)

Source

AI Vortex editorial rule of October 22, 2026 (a page states what the sources say and does not narrate our research process)

Pages that carry this correction (107)

Oregon sanction figure removed

· 112 pages

What changed

  • Removed an Oregon sanction figure that did not match any court record. The Oregon case in our sanctions dataset is Couvrette v. Wisnovsky (D. Or.): a $15,500 sanction plus $94,700 in costs, $110,204 in total. (111 pages)
  • Removed an Oregon case name and attorney description that did not match any court record. (2 pages)

Source

Couvrette v. Wisnovsky, D. Or. (order PDF in the AI Hallucination Cases database); AI sanctions tracker: dataset of court-recorded sanctions

Pages that carry this correction (112)

Case facts corrected: Morgan v. V2X and Brigandi

· 17 pages

What changed

  • Corrected Morgan v. V2X to D. Colo. No. 1:25-cv-01991, order of March 30, 2026. Courts, dates and requirements that did not match that order were removed. (16 pages)
  • Replaced an unsupported Brigandi sanction amount and date with the dataset's Couvrette v. Wisnovsky amounts: $15,500 plus $94,700 in costs, $110,204 in total. (1 page)

Source

Morgan v. V2X, D. Colo., No. 1:25-cv-01991 (order of March 30, 2026); AI sanctions tracker: dataset of court-recorded sanctions

Pages that carry this correction (17)

Case facts corrected: Park v. Kim and other entries

· 24 pages

What changed

  • Corrected Park v. Kim to the Second Circuit opinion (No. 22-2057): the court referred the lawyer to its Grievance Panel and imposed no fine. (7 pages)
  • Removed three case entries that are not in the sanctions dataset. (4 pages)
  • Corrected the Cherry Hill, New Jersey sanction of April 27 to the Bunce case (E.D. Pa., $5,000). (14 pages)
  • Replaced Q1 2026 sanction totals that came from a secondary source with figures computed from the sanctions dataset. (3 pages)

Source

Park v. Kim, 2d Cir., No. 22-2057 (opinion); Bunce v. Visual Technology Innovations, E.D. Pa. (ruling reported April 2026); AI sanctions tracker: dataset of court-recorded sanctions

Pages that carry this correction (24)

Judge Starr: AI certification is no longer required

· 15 pages

What changed

  • Corrected the Judge Starr entry: a standing AI certification is no longer required. The current rules are N.D. Tex. LR 7.2(f) and LCrR 47.2(e), editions in force September 1, 2026. (15 pages)

Source

Judge Brantley Starr, N.D. Tex. (judge page); N.D. Tex. local civil rules (LR 7.2(f)) and criminal rules (LCrR 47.2(e))

Pages that carry this correction (15)

DISCO corporate history corrected

· 3 pages

What changed

  • Removed incorrect statements about DISCO's corporate history. The company's current status is the one in its own SEC filings. (3 pages)

Source

CS Disco Q2 fiscal 2026 earnings release (SEC filing, August 5, 2026)

Pages that carry this correction (3)