Independent legal AI intelligence for the firms trying to see what is actually changing.
AI Vortex publishes research on legal AI tools, firm adoption, court disclosure rules, sanctions, funding, and the new discovery layer forming across search and AI systems.
Five years inside a US law firm. Not the pitch decks. Not the conference panels. The actual work — who does what, how long it takes, where the bottlenecks are, and where the money leaks.
Every week I publish intelligence on what is actually changing in legal: which firms are getting sanctioned for AI misuse, where the funding is flowing, and which AI-native firms are pulling partners out of BigLaw. But research is only half of what I do. The other half is building — I help firms redesign operations around one question: what requires a licensed attorney, and what does not?
I am not selling software. I am not an AI vendor. I am an operator who understands legal work from the inside and builds infrastructure around it. If you want a straight answer on where your firm stands, I have a few diagnostic calls open each month.
AI Vortex is built for people who need the straight read, not another vendor pitch.
The site covers legal AI from an operational point of view: what tools actually do, where they fit, what risks they introduce, and how law firms should think about the work before buying or building.
That means comparisons, disclosure rules, pricing research, case law, governance notes, and practical diagnostics. The goal is simple: help legal teams understand the terrain before the shortlist is already decided by search, AI systems, or vendor marketing.