Corpus analyticsThe public record,
The public record,
measured honestly.
Understand the legal AI risk landscape in seconds. Explore trends, sources, attribution, and consequences, then inspect the records behind every signal.
Current view178 of 2,223 records
failures
Open data table Leading failures
Counts use the current filter set. Select a row to inspect the underlying public records.
How AI involvement is recorded
Tool unidentified84
Named tool recorded49
AI implied or unspecified44
Allegation-only record1
One primary result per matter
Known monetary consequence107
Professional or bar consequence71
Most represented jurisdictions
Traceability of this view
Publisher document archive163 92%
Secondary or other source13 7%
Docket or document mirror1 1%
Source link missing1 1%
Cross-tab analysis
Compare two recorded dimensions
Cells count matched matters. Failure and consequence tags can overlap, so row and column totals are not mutually exclusive.
Matching records
Open full directory Preview the evidence behind this view
DateCaseCourtToolAmount
Oct 7, 2026Washington v. JusticeCA Florida (2d)AI (implied, unspecified)—Oct 1, 2026P. M. M. c/ G. A., F. M. d. S.H. s/ cobro ordinario de sumas de dineroCA MorónNo tool named in source—Sep 24, 2026Cervantes v. BiancoSC CaliforniaUnidentified—Sep 3, 2026Douglas v. Deutsche Bank National Trust CompanyD.C. Court of AppealsGoogle AI—Sep 2, 2026Morgan Cole v. Hobby Town Unlimited, Inc.C.D. IllinoisNo tool named in source$1,000.00Aug 27, 2026Thomas Raynard James v. Detective Kevin Conley, et al.S.D. FloridaUnidentified—