Home/Analytics

Corpus analytics

The public record,
measured honestly.

Understand the legal AI risk landscape in seconds. Explore trends, sources, attribution, and consequences, then inspect the records behind every signal.

Corpus intelligence

See the record, its shape, and its limits.

Counts describe tracked public matters, not industry incidence. Failure and consequence tags can overlap. Monetary metrics use only records with a known amount.

Tracked matters1,80942 countries · Apr 14, 2023 to Jul 24, 2026 Source-linked100%1,809 of 1,809 records contain a source URL Courts represented60853 US jurisdictions represented Latest 30 days103Relative to latest recorded decision Known monetary total$1.65M208 records with a recorded amount

Corpus growthCumulative record and monthly additionsInteractive decision-date view

View

Decision month. Corpus-added dates are not recorded. The latest period may be incomplete. Hover for values; click a period to inspect records.

Observed consequencesWhat the record says happened

tags overlap

Warning or admonishment605

Monetary sanction378

Bar or professional referral145

Professional discipline129

Dismissal or adverse disposition108

Recurring signalsLeading failure modes

tags overlap

Fabricated authorities1,542

Trial1,530

Pro Se1,060

Misrepresented authority762

Fabricated or altered quotations591

ConcentrationMost represented courts

corpus coverage

Attribution statusHow AI involvement is recorded

record classification

AI implied or unspecified1,212

Tool unidentified383

Named tool recorded199

Allegation-only record15

A recorded name or implication is not proof of causation; inspect the underlying source.

Source qualityLinked evidence by source tier

URL classification

Publisher document archive1,667

Secondary or other source97

Docket or document mirror29

Official court or government16

A source link improves traceability but does not mean every field was independently verified.

Review statusRecorded human review coverage

Marked human-reviewed0

Not marked human-reviewed1,809

Review status reflects the tracker field; absence of a mark does not prove no review occurred.

Trust and quality

Know what is present, and what is missing.

100%source-linked1,809 records

1,667Publisher document archivelargest source tier

208known amounts$1,650,315 total

1,794non-allegation-only15 allegation-only

0human-reviewed0% of corpus

0missing source linkinspect before relying

Inspect data quality

Inspect and analyze

Go from signal to source-backed record.

Every chart links back to the public matters behind it. Use Explore when you need a narrower, reproducible view.

Inspect matching records Build a filtered view

Home/Analytics

Corpus analytics

The public record,
measured honestly.

Understand the legal AI risk landscape in seconds. Explore trends, sources, attribution, and consequences, then inspect the records behind every signal.

Corpus intelligence

See the record, its shape, and its limits.

Counts describe tracked public matters, not industry incidence. Failure and consequence tags can overlap. Monetary metrics use only records with a known amount.

Corpus growthCumulative record and monthly additionsInteractive decision-date view

View

Decision month. Corpus-added dates are not recorded. The latest period may be incomplete. Hover for values; click a period to inspect records.

Observed consequencesWhat the record says happened

tags overlap

Warning or admonishment605

Monetary sanction378

Bar or professional referral145

Professional discipline129

Dismissal or adverse disposition108

Recurring signalsLeading failure modes

tags overlap

Fabricated authorities1,542

Trial1,530

Pro Se1,060

Misrepresented authority762

Fabricated or altered quotations591

ConcentrationMost represented courts

corpus coverage

Attribution statusHow AI involvement is recorded

record classification

AI implied or unspecified1,212

Tool unidentified383

Named tool recorded199

Allegation-only record15

A recorded name or implication is not proof of causation; inspect the underlying source.

Source qualityLinked evidence by source tier

URL classification

Publisher document archive1,667

Secondary or other source97

Docket or document mirror29

Official court or government16

A source link improves traceability but does not mean every field was independently verified.

Review statusRecorded human review coverage

Marked human-reviewed0

Not marked human-reviewed1,809

Review status reflects the tracker field; absence of a mark does not prove no review occurred.

Trust and quality

Know what is present, and what is missing.

100%source-linked1,809 records

1,667Publisher document archivelargest source tier

208known amounts$1,650,315 total

1,794non-allegation-only15 allegation-only

0human-reviewed0% of corpus

0missing source linkinspect before relying

Inspect data quality

Inspect and analyze

Go from signal to source-backed record.

Every chart links back to the public matters behind it. Use Explore when you need a narrower, reproducible view.

Inspect matching records Build a filtered view