Corpus analyticsThe public record,
The public record,
measured honestly.
Understand the legal AI risk landscape in seconds. Explore trends, sources, attribution, and consequences, then inspect the records behind every signal.
Current view122 of 2,215 records
failures
Open data table Leading failures
Counts use the current filter set. Select a row to inspect the underlying public records.
How AI involvement is recorded
Tool unidentified67
AI implied or unspecified44
Named tool recorded11
One primary result per matter
Filing or case consequence87
Known monetary consequence28
Professional or bar consequence7
Most represented jurisdictions
Traceability of this view
Publisher document archive113 93%
Secondary or other source7 6%
Docket or document mirror1 1%
Official court or government1 1%
Cross-tab analysis
Compare two recorded dimensions
Cells count matched matters. Failure and consequence tags can overlap, so row and column totals are not mutually exclusive.
Matching records
Open full directory Preview the evidence behind this view
DateCaseCourtToolAmount
Oct 7, 2026Tapscott v. FarissCA IowaAI (implied, unspecified)—Oct 7, 2026Washington v. JusticeCA Florida (2d)AI (implied, unspecified)—Oct 1, 2026P. M. M. c/ G. A., F. M. d. S.H. s/ cobro ordinario de sumas de dineroCA MorónNo tool named in source—Sep 23, 2026Williams v. Wogan Group, LLC d/b/a Chapel Ridge Apartments of Forrest CityCA Arkansas (1d)No tool named in source—Sep 15, 2026Beard v. Frasier et al.E.D. MissouriNo tool named in source—Sep 1, 2026Willie C. Fortune v. CTA Certified TransmissionMissouri CANo tool named in source—