Corpus analyticsThe public record,
The public record,
measured honestly.
Understand the legal AI risk landscape in seconds. Explore trends, sources, attribution, and consequences, then inspect the records behind every signal.
Current view6 of 2,038 records
failures
Open data table Leading failures
Counts use the current filter set. Select a row to inspect the underlying public records.
How AI involvement is recorded
Named tool recorded4
AI implied or unspecified1
Tool unidentified1
One primary result per matter
Professional or bar consequence4
Known monetary consequence2
Most represented jurisdictions
Traceability of this view
Publisher document archive5 83%
Secondary or other source1 17%
Cross-tab analysis
Compare two recorded dimensions
Cells count matched matters. Failure and consequence tags can overlap, so row and column totals are not mutually exclusive.
Matching records
Open full directory Preview the evidence behind this view
DateCaseCourtToolAmount
Apr 3, 2026United States v. Farris6th Cir. CAWestlaw CoCounsel—Mar 31, 2026Joel A. Rivera v. Triad Properties Corporation, et al.N.D. AlabamaChatGPT$35.6KMar 20, 2026State v. ColemanCA OhioChatGPT$2.0KNov 28, 2025Elías Axel Roberto Rafael s/ Abuso sexual con acceso carnalCSJ de TucumánAI (implied, unspecified)—Jul 23, 2025Johnson v. DunnN.D. AlabamaChatGPT—Feb 11, 2025Luck v Commonwealth of AustraliaFederal CourtUnidentified—