Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Jul 27, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 24, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Corpus analyticsThe public record,
The public record,
measured honestly.
Understand the legal AI risk landscape in seconds. Explore trends, sources, attribution, and consequences, then inspect the records behind every signal.
Current view378 of 1,809 records
failures
Open data table Leading failures
Counts use the current filter set. Select a row to inspect the underlying public records.
How AI involvement is recorded
AI implied or unspecified167
Tool unidentified132
Named tool recorded78
Allegation-only record1
One primary result per matter
Known monetary consequence378
Most represented jurisdictions
Traceability of this view
Publisher document archive347 92%
Secondary or other source27 7%
Docket or document mirror4 1%
Cross-tab analysis
Compare two recorded dimensions
Cells count matched matters. Failure and consequence tags can overlap, so row and column totals are not mutually exclusive.
Matching records
Open full directory Preview the evidence behind this view
DateCaseCourtToolAmount
Jul 24, 2026Joann LeDoux v. Outliers, Inc.W.D. WashingtonChatGPT, Claude$3.0KJul 22, 2026Pamon v. United States Postal Service et alN.D. TexasAI (implied, unspecified)$610Jul 17, 2026Haddadi et al. v. Soleimani et al., 2026 ONSC 3920DC OntarioAI (implied, unspecified)—Jul 15, 2026Arrieta v. CervantesCA ArizonaAI (implied, unspecified)$1Jul 15, 2026Dineen/Shibata v. KotchkaCA Arizona (1d)Unidentified—Jul 15, 2026State v. DixonCA OregonAI (implied, unspecified)$100