Corpus analyticsThe public record,
The public record,
measured honestly.
Understand the legal AI risk landscape in seconds. Explore trends, sources, attribution, and consequences, then inspect the records behind every signal.
Current view439 of 2,038 records
failures
Open data table Leading failures
Counts use the current filter set. Select a row to inspect the underlying public records.
How AI involvement is recorded
AI implied or unspecified196
Tool unidentified153
Named tool recorded89
Allegation-only record1
One primary result per matter
Known monetary consequence439
Most represented jurisdictions
Traceability of this view
Publisher document archive404 92%
Secondary or other source29 7%
Docket or document mirror4 1%
Source link missing2 0%
Cross-tab analysis
Compare two recorded dimensions
Cells count matched matters. Failure and consequence tags can overlap, so row and column totals are not mutually exclusive.
Matching records
Open full directory Preview the evidence behind this view
DateCaseCourtToolAmount
Sep 9, 2026Beus Gilbert PLLC v. Brigham Young University et al.D. UtahClearBrief, Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini$3.0KSep 8, 2026Asiedu v. EastlundCA MinnesotaUnidentified$2.3KSep 8, 2026State ex rel. Steven Schnell v. Honorable Rebecca RichardsonCA MissouriUnidentified$1.8KSep 2, 2026Morgan Cole v. Hobby Town Unlimited, Inc.C.D. IllinoisAI (implied, unspecified)—Aug 28, 2026Erin Booker v. The Kroger Co.N.D. GeorgiaUnidentified$8.0KAug 27, 2026Adams v. Matrix Providers Inc. et al.D. ColoradoAI (implied, unspecified)$1.0K