Home/Analytics/explore

Corpus analytics

The public record,
measured honestly.

Understand the legal AI risk landscape in seconds. Explore trends, sources, attribution, and consequences, then inspect the records behind every signal.

FiltersReset all

ScopeSearch within records

FromTo

CountryUS stateCourtJudge

Conduct & consequenceEditorial impactRecorded AI toolFailure modeRecorded consequenceAI attribution status

Evidence qualitySource tierHuman-review recordRecord statusPrimary chart

1 active

Current view57 of 2,205 records

sanction: non-monetary Export current CSV PDF briefReset view

Matched matters573 jurisdictions (distinct countries after merging aliases (GB/UK, US/USA), plus Hong Kong and Northern Cyprus)

Source-linked100%57 records

Courts41represented in view

Latest 30 days6relative to Sep 15, 2026

Known amount, USD$128,11734 USD matters; 34 records with any amount, other currencies not summed

Human-reviewed00% of this view

failures

Leading failures

Counts use the current filter set. Select a row to inspect the underlying public records.

Open data table

Fabricated authorities52 91%

Fabricated or altered quotations29 51%

Misrepresented authority27 47%

Attribution status

How AI involvement is recorded

Tool unidentified23

Named tool recorded19

AI implied or unspecified15

Consequence mix

One primary result per matter

Known monetary consequence38

Warning or court intervention10

Professional or bar consequence8

Filing or case consequence1

Geography

Most represented jurisdictions

Source tiers

Traceability of this view

Publisher document archive52 91%

Secondary or other source4 7%

Docket or document mirror1 2%

Cross-tab analysis

Compare two recorded dimensions

Cells count matched matters. Failure and consequence tags can overlap, so row and column totals are not mutually exclusive.

Failure	Known monetary consequence	Warning or court intervention	Professional or bar consequence	Filing or case consequence	Row records
Fabricated authorities	3561%	1018%	611%	12%	52
Fabricated or altered quotations	1933%	611%	35%	12%	29
Misrepresented authority	1730%	59%	47%	12%	27
Unclassified	—	—	12%	—	1

Matching records

Preview the evidence behind this view

Open full directory

DateCaseCourtToolAmount

Sep 15, 2026Bell v. City of Clairton et al.W.D. PennsylvaniaLexis AI—Sep 14, 2026Tiekert v. Village of Mamaroneck, et al.S.D. New YorkChatGPT$500 Sep 9, 2026Beus Gilbert PLLC v. Brigham Young University et al.D. UtahClaude, ChatGPT, and Gemini$3.0K Sep 3, 2026Registered Trustees of the Assemblies of God Gospel Church International (AGGCI) v Registrar of Societies and OthersHigh CourtAI (implied, unspecified)—Aug 28, 2026Erin Booker v. The Kroger Co.N.D. GeorgiaUnidentified$8.0K Aug 25, 2026LPC Commercial Services, LLC v. Ar-Razzaaq Properties, LLCCA VirginiaAI (implied, unspecified)—