Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Jul 27, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 24, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Corpus analyticsThe public record,
The public record,
measured honestly.
Understand the legal AI risk landscape in seconds. Explore trends, sources, attribution, and consequences, then inspect the records behind every signal.
Current view86 of 1,809 records
failures
Open data table Leading failures
Counts use the current filter set. Select a row to inspect the underlying public records.
How AI involvement is recorded
AI implied or unspecified69
Tool unidentified12
Named tool recorded5
One primary result per matter
Warning or court intervention83
Professional or bar consequence2
Known monetary consequence1
Most represented jurisdictions
Traceability of this view
Publisher document archive81 94%
Secondary or other source3 3%
Docket or document mirror1 1%
Official court or government1 1%
Cross-tab analysis
Compare two recorded dimensions
Cells count matched matters. Failure and consequence tags can overlap, so row and column totals are not mutually exclusive.
Matching records
Open full directory Preview the evidence behind this view
DateCaseCourtToolAmount
Jul 24, 2026Morgan Cole v. Hobby Town Unlimited, Inc.C.D. IllinoisAI (implied, unspecified)—Jul 22, 2026Gideon J. Sipin v. The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., et al.N.D. AlabamaAI (implied, unspecified)—Jul 22, 2026Rose Lannquist Gouldy v. Timothy M. Chiasson, et al.CA Florida (4d)AI (implied, unspecified)—Jul 8, 2026Michael L. Ruiz v. Magellan Financial & Insurance ServicesD. ArizonaAI (implied, unspecified)—Jul 2, 2026Pedro Paulo Mansur Pagano Sampaio v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.C.D. CaliforniaAI (implied, unspecified)—Jul 1, 2026Kevin Leiske et al. v. Robert Gregory Kidd et al.Delaware Ch.Unidentified—