Corpus analyticsThe public record,
The public record,
measured honestly.
Understand the legal AI risk landscape in seconds. Explore trends, sources, attribution, and consequences, then inspect the records behind every signal.
Current view103 of 2,223 records
failures
Open data table Leading failures
Counts use the current filter set. Select a row to inspect the underlying public records.
How AI involvement is recorded
Tool unidentified55
AI implied or unspecified40
Named tool recorded8
One primary result per matter
Warning or court intervention100
Filing or case consequence1
Known monetary consequence1
Professional or bar consequence1
Most represented jurisdictions
Traceability of this view
Publisher document archive98 95%
Secondary or other source3 3%
Docket or document mirror1 1%
Official court or government1 1%
Cross-tab analysis
Compare two recorded dimensions
Cells count matched matters. Failure and consequence tags can overlap, so row and column totals are not mutually exclusive.
Matching records
Open full directory Preview the evidence behind this view
DateCaseCourtToolAmount
Oct 1, 2026Simpson v. PorterSC ArkansasAI (implied, unspecified)—Sep 30, 2026Miller v. Colorado Department of RevenueD. ColoradoNo tool named in source—Sep 28, 2026Orlando Chechitelli v. Etiwanda School District, et al.C.D. CaliforniaAI (implied, unspecified)—Sep 28, 2026Williams v. Federal Aviation Administration et al.D. ConnecticutNo tool named in source—Sep 22, 2026Garner v. Transit Employees Federal Credit UnionD. D.C.No tool named in source—Sep 22, 2026Zhejiang Dingli Machinery Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of International TradeNo tool named in source—