Corpus analyticsThe public record,
The public record,
measured honestly.
Understand the legal AI risk landscape in seconds. Explore trends, sources, attribution, and consequences, then inspect the records behind every signal.
Current view100 of 2,215 records
failures
Open data table Leading failures
Counts use the current filter set. Select a row to inspect the underlying public records.
How AI involvement is recorded
Tool unidentified53
AI implied or unspecified32
Named tool recorded14
Allegation-only record1
One primary result per matter
Filing or case consequence65
Known monetary consequence33
Professional or bar consequence2
Most represented jurisdictions
Traceability of this view
Publisher document archive96 96%
Secondary or other source4 4%
Cross-tab analysis
Compare two recorded dimensions
Cells count matched matters. Failure and consequence tags can overlap, so row and column totals are not mutually exclusive.
Matching records
Open full directory Preview the evidence behind this view
DateCaseCourtToolAmount
Oct 8, 2026Avargil et al. v. Yaakov et al.MC Nof HaGalil-NazarethUnidentified—Oct 7, 2026Butler v. The Travelers Indemnity CompanySC ConnecticutNo tool named in source—Oct 2, 2026Shannon v. ShannonSC NebraskaUnidentified—Sep 28, 2026Verduzco v. Con Agra Foods Packaged Foods, LLCE.D. CaliforniaAI (implied, unspecified)—Sep 4, 2026Wurm v. Anchor Bay Packaging CorporationE.D. MichiganNo tool named in source—Aug 26, 2026Noella P. Turgeon v. FHLMCD. New HampshireNo tool named in source—