Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Jul 27, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 24, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Corpus analyticsThe public record,
The public record,
measured honestly.
Understand the legal AI risk landscape in seconds. Explore trends, sources, attribution, and consequences, then inspect the records behind every signal.
Current view80 of 1,809 records
failures
Open data table Leading failures
Counts use the current filter set. Select a row to inspect the underlying public records.
How AI involvement is recorded
AI implied or unspecified44
Tool unidentified26
Named tool recorded9
Allegation-only record1
One primary result per matter
Filing or case consequence50
Known monetary consequence29
Professional or bar consequence1
Most represented jurisdictions
Traceability of this view
Publisher document archive76 95%
Secondary or other source4 5%
Cross-tab analysis
Compare two recorded dimensions
Cells count matched matters. Failure and consequence tags can overlap, so row and column totals are not mutually exclusive.
Matching records
Open full directory Preview the evidence behind this view
DateCaseCourtToolAmount
Jul 21, 2026Evans v. Robertson (4)E.D. MichiganAI (implied, unspecified)—Jul 20, 2026Khan v. Howard County BAPCA MarylandAI (implied, unspecified)—Jul 16, 2026בדש נ' אוחנהMagistrate's Court, Tel Aviv-JaffaUnidentified—Jul 15, 2026Mullins v. Duquesne University of the Holy SpiritW.D. PennsylvaniaClaude—Jul 15, 2026Rebecca Jean v. Seattle Credit UnionW.D. WashingtonUnidentified—Jul 15, 2026State v. DixonCA OregonAI (implied, unspecified)$100