Corpus analyticsThe public record,
The public record,
measured honestly.
Understand the legal AI risk landscape in seconds. Explore trends, sources, attribution, and consequences, then inspect the records behind every signal.
Current view93 of 2,038 records
failures
Open data table Leading failures
Counts use the current filter set. Select a row to inspect the underlying public records.
How AI involvement is recorded
AI implied or unspecified53
Tool unidentified29
Named tool recorded10
Allegation-only record1
One primary result per matter
Filing or case consequence58
Known monetary consequence32
Professional or bar consequence3
Most represented jurisdictions
Traceability of this view
Publisher document archive89 96%
Secondary or other source4 4%
Cross-tab analysis
Compare two recorded dimensions
Cells count matched matters. Failure and consequence tags can overlap, so row and column totals are not mutually exclusive.
Matching records
Open full directory Preview the evidence behind this view
DateCaseCourtToolAmount
Sep 4, 2026Wurm v. Anchor Bay Packaging CorporationE.D. MichiganAI (implied, unspecified)—Aug 26, 2026Noella P. Turgeon v. FHLMCD. New HampshireAI (implied, unspecified)—Aug 25, 2026Solicitors Regulation Authority Ltd v Abhishek KumarSolicitors Disciplinary TribunalUnidentified—Aug 21, 2026Capital Standard, LLC v. U.S. Bank National AssociationCA Florida (2d)Unidentified$1.5KAug 18, 2026Joann LeDoux v. Outliers, Inc. (2)W.D. WashingtonClaude and ChatGPT—Aug 18, 2026Kourradi v. ChristopherCA TexasAI (implied, unspecified)—