Which source supports this A. P. v. S. K. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

HomeCasesA. P. v. S. K.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.

Corpus matter record

A. P. v. S. K.

CA Québec · Aug 11, 2026

Canada Editorial impact: medium pro se fake citations fabricated quotes family Monetary

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Memorandum cited two non-existent Supreme Court judgments generated by AI and attributed legal principles to them; Court found the judgments do not exist. Outcome: Monetary Sanction.

Why the court cared: The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Monetary Sanction. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Monetary Sanction in CA Québec. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Monetary Sanction in CA Québec. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtCA Québec

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateAug 11, 2026

AI toolChatGPT

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeMonetary Sanction

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

ChatGPT is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Monetary Sanction

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Memorandum cited two non-existent Supreme Court judgments generated by AI and attributed legal principles to them; Court found the judgments do not exist.
Fabricated: Case Law | Memorandum cited two non-existent lower court judgments generated by AI and quoted purported holdings from them; Court found the judgments do not exist.
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant reproduced specific quotations of legal principles attributed to the fabricated decisions; Court determined the quotations were invented along with the decisions.
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant acknowledged the authorities and quotations were produced by ChatGPT and that some were removed from his book of authorities; Court found he nonetheless filed a memorandum containing fabricated references.

Questions this record answers

What happened in A. P. v. S. K.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Memorandum cited two non-existent Supreme Court judgments generated by AI and attributed legal principles to them; Court found the judgments do not exist. Outcome: Monetary Sanction.
Why does A. P. v. S. K. matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Monetary Sanction in CA Québec. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about A. P. v. S. K.?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this A. P. v. S. K. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Teresa Jewel Whitten v. Kristopher Brian EverittCA Kentucky · Jul 10, 2026pro se + fake citations In the Interest of Q.C. and P.C., ChildrenCA Texas · Jul 9, 2026pro se + fake citations Ex parte A.I.F.-H. f/k/a A.I.F.CA Alabama · Jun 26, 2026pro se + fake citations State of Iowa ex rel J.G. v. Mynesia A. AndersonCA Iowa · Jun 10, 2026pro se + fake citations Young v. YoungCA Minnesotta · Jun 8, 2026pro se + fake citations Washington v. WashingtonCA Georgia · Jun 4, 2026pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source Suggest a correction to this record

Public-record statuspublic record, not an allegation-only entry

Indexing eligibilitypublicly indexable with evidence status disclosed

Published and maintained byManu Ayala · AI VortexIndependent legal AI risk intelligence

Corpus snapshot checked Aug 16, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Aug 16, 2026; latest tracked decision Aug 13, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Open CA Québec profile Explore jurisdiction

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology