HomeCasesAlexey Dubinin v. Varsenik Papazian

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Alexey Dubinin v. Varsenik Papazian

S.D. Florida · Nov 21, 2025

FL / federalEditorial impact: highfake citationsfabricated quotesbar referraladministrative

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's Response cited a decision from this Court that does not exist; the Court's independent review confirmed non-existence. Outcome: Costs Order; Bar Referral.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's Response cited a decision from this Court that does not exist; the Court's independent review confirmed non-existence. || False Quotes: Case Law | Response included quotations attributed to Eleventh Circuit opinions that do not appear in those opinions; Court identified multiple such misquotes. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court's Order to Show Cause listed at least ten instances across the Complaint and Response citing non-existent cases and quotes (AI-hallucinated authorities).
Why it matters now: Ten fake citations across a Complaint and Response equals bar referral; require second-attorney verification before any filing.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's Response cited a decision from this Court that does not exist; the Court's independent review confirmed non-existence. Outcome: Costs Order; Bar Referral.

Operational lesson

Ten fake citations across a Complaint and Response equals bar referral; require second-attorney verification before any filing.

Record details

FloridaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtS.D. Florida

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit11th Circuit

DateNov 21, 2025

AI toolUnidentified

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeCosts Order; Bar Referral

Known amount$4,030

Professional sanctionYes

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Costs Order; Bar Referral

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's Response cited a decision from this Court that does not exist; the Court's independent review confirmed non-existence.
False Quotes: Case Law | Response included quotations attributed to Eleventh Circuit opinions that do not appear in those opinions; Court identified multiple such misquotes.
Fabricated: Case Law | Court's Order to Show Cause listed at least ten instances across the Complaint and Response citing non-existent cases and quotes (AI-hallucinated authorities).

Questions this record answers

What happened in Alexey Dubinin v. Varsenik Papazian?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's Response cited a decision from this Court that does not exist; the Court's independent review confirmed non-existence. Outcome: Costs Order; Bar Referral.
Why does Alexey Dubinin v. Varsenik Papazian matter for legal AI risk?: Ten fake citations across a Complaint and Response equals bar referral; require second-attorney verification before any filing.
What does the public record establish about Alexey Dubinin v. Varsenik Papazian?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Alexey Dubinin v. Varsenik Papazian summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Jorge A. Zea v. National Association of REALTORSS.D. Florida · Mar 24, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Juandel Pena and Martina Ruiz v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.S.D. Florida · Feb 19, 2026same court · fake citations + administrative Mitchell Taylor Button & Dusty Button v. Sigrid McCawleyS.D. Florida · Feb 4, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Ayatollah Hylton v. Chivone Janee Hylton, et al.S.D. Florida · Jan 5, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Multiphone Latin America v. Millicom International CellularS.D. Florida · Aug 28, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes ByoPlanet International v. Johansson and GilstrapS.D. Florida · Aug 1, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's Response cited a decision from this Court that does not exist; the Court's independent review confirmed non-existence. Outcome: Costs Order; Bar Referral.

Operational lesson

Ten fake citations across a Complaint and Response equals bar referral; require second-attorney verification before any filing.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's Response cited a decision from this Court that does not exist; the Court's independent review confirmed non-existence.

False Quotes: Case Law | Response included quotations attributed to Eleventh Circuit opinions that do not appear in those opinions; Court identified multiple such misquotes.

Fabricated: Case Law | Court's Order to Show Cause listed at least ten instances across the Complaint and Response citing non-existent cases and quotes (AI-hallucinated authorities).

Questions this record answers

What happened in Alexey Dubinin v. Varsenik Papazian?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's Response cited a decision from this Court that does not exist; the Court's independent review confirmed non-existence. Outcome: Costs Order; Bar Referral.

Why does Alexey Dubinin v. Varsenik Papazian matter for legal AI risk?

Ten fake citations across a Complaint and Response equals bar referral; require second-attorney verification before any filing.

What does the public record establish about Alexey Dubinin v. Varsenik Papazian?

Which source supports this Alexey Dubinin v. Varsenik Papazian summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.