AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Sep 10, 2026 · Latest decision Sep 8, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesMultiphone Latin America v. Millicom International Cellular
Evidence review: primary document limited. The primary document was retrieved, but one or more case-level facts could not be tied to a page-located passage. The structured corpus baseline is preserved without upgrading those claims.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Multiphone Latin America v. Millicom International Cellular

S.D. Florida · Aug 28, 2025

FL / federalEditorial impact: highfake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authoritycontractBar ReferralProfessional
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Misrepresented: Case Law | Response cites at least four existing cases for propositions those opinions do not discuss (e.g., citing Morrison v. Nissan Motor Co., 601 F.2d 139 for an unrelated point); Court identified misapplication of authority. Outcome: Referral to District Ad Hoc Committee and the Florida Bar for investigation.

Why the court cared
The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Referral to District Ad Hoc Committee and the Florida Bar for investigation; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now
Bar referrals follow fabricated citations even without monetary fines; verify every quote against the actual opinion text.

Why this matter is tracked

Misrepresented: Case Law | Response cites at least four existing cases for propositions those opinions do not discuss (e.g., citing Morrison v. Nissan Motor Co., 601 F.2d 139 for an unrelated point); Court identified misapplication of authority. Outcome: Referral to District Ad Hoc Committee and the Florida Bar for investigation.

Operational lesson

Bar referrals follow fabricated citations even without monetary fines; verify every quote against the actual opinion text.

Record details

FloridaSingle-state evidence scope
Explore FLOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtS.D. Florida
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit11th Circuit
DateAug 28, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeReferral to District Ad Hoc Committee and the Florida Bar for investigation
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionYes
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Referral to District Ad Hoc Committee and the Florida Bar for investigation

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Misrepresented: Case Law | Response cites at least four existing cases for propositions those opinions do not discuss (e.g., citing Morrison v. Nissan Motor Co., 601 F.2d 139 for an unrelated point); Court identified misapplication of authority.
  2. False Quotes: Case Law | Proposed Sur-Reply and Response attribute quoted language to Cohen v. Cooper (20 So. 3d 453) that does not appear in that opinion; Court identified the misquote.
  3. False Quotes: Case Law | Counsel presented quotes drawn from Westlaw Keynotes as if they were verbatim text from opinions (examples include Rollins and Stewart), a misrepresentation the Court noted.
  4. Fabricated: Case Law | Response cites 'Metropolitan Dade County v. Dyer, 315 So. 2d 442, 444 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)', which the Court found appears not to exist.
  5. Fabricated: Case Law | Response cites 'QBE Ins. Corp. v. Dome Constr. Corp., 10 So. 3d 676, 678 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)', another authority the Court determined appears to be nonexistent.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Multiphone Latin America v. Millicom International Cellular?
Misrepresented: Case Law | Response cites at least four existing cases for propositions those opinions do not discuss (e.g., citing Morrison v. Nissan Motor Co., 601 F.2d 139 for an unrelated point); Court identified misapplication of authority. Outcome: Referral to District Ad Hoc Committee and the Florida Bar for investigation.
Why does Multiphone Latin America v. Millicom International Cellular matter for legal AI risk?
Bar referrals follow fabricated citations even without monetary fines; verify every quote against the actual opinion text.
What does the public record establish about Multiphone Latin America v. Millicom International Cellular?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Multiphone Latin America v. Millicom International Cellular summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Mitchell Taylor Button & Dusty Button v. Sigrid McCawleyS.D. Florida · Feb 4, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesJorge A. Zea v. National Association of REALTORSS.D. Florida · Mar 24, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesByoPlanet International v. Johansson and GilstrapS.D. Florida · Aug 1, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesAyatollah Hylton v. Chivone Janee Hylton, et al.S.D. Florida · Jan 5, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesCrespo v. Tesla, Inc.S.D. Florida · Jun 30, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesJoseph C. Zoghaib v. Societe Generale De Banque Au Liban, et al.S.D. Florida · Apr 8, 2026same court · misrepresented authority + contract