Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Multiphone Latin America v. Millicom International Cellular
S.D. Florida · Aug 28, 2025
FL / federalEditorial impact: highfake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authoritycontract
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Misrepresented: Case Law | Response cites at least four existing cases for propositions those opinions do not discuss (e.g., citing Morrison v. Nissan Motor Co., 601 F.2d 139 for an unrelated point); Court identified misapplication of authority. Outcome: Referral to District Ad Hoc Committee and the Florida Bar for investigation.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Referral to District Ad Hoc Committee and the Florida Bar for investigation; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- Bar referrals follow fabricated citations even without monetary fines; verify every quote against the actual opinion text.
Why this matter is tracked
Misrepresented: Case Law | Response cites at least four existing cases for propositions those opinions do not discuss (e.g., citing Morrison v. Nissan Motor Co., 601 F.2d 139 for an unrelated point); Court identified misapplication of authority. Outcome: Referral to District Ad Hoc Committee and the Florida Bar for investigation.
Operational lesson
Bar referrals follow fabricated citations even without monetary fines; verify every quote against the actual opinion text.
Record details
FloridaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtS.D. Florida
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit11th Circuit
DateAug 28, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeReferral to District Ad Hoc Committee and the Florida Bar for investigation
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionYes
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Referral to District Ad Hoc Committee and the Florida Bar for investigation
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Response cites at least four existing cases for propositions those opinions do not discuss (e.g., citing Morrison v. Nissan Motor Co., 601 F.2d 139 for an unrelated point); Court identified misapplication of authority.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Proposed Sur-Reply and Response attribute quoted language to Cohen v. Cooper (20 So. 3d 453) that does not appear in that opinion; Court identified the misquote.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Counsel presented quotes drawn from Westlaw Keynotes as if they were verbatim text from opinions (examples include Rollins and Stewart), a misrepresentation the Court noted.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Response cites 'Metropolitan Dade County v. Dyer, 315 So. 2d 442, 444 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)', which the Court found appears not to exist.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Response cites 'QBE Ins. Corp. v. Dome Constr. Corp., 10 So. 3d 676, 678 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)', another authority the Court determined appears to be nonexistent.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Multiphone Latin America v. Millicom International Cellular?
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Response cites at least four existing cases for propositions those opinions do not discuss (e.g., citing Morrison v. Nissan Motor Co., 601 F.2d 139 for an unrelated point); Court identified misapplication of authority. Outcome: Referral to District Ad Hoc Committee and the Florida Bar for investigation.
- Why does Multiphone Latin America v. Millicom International Cellular matter for legal AI risk?
- Bar referrals follow fabricated citations even without monetary fines; verify every quote against the actual opinion text.
- What does the public record establish about Multiphone Latin America v. Millicom International Cellular?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Multiphone Latin America v. Millicom International Cellular summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.