HomeCasesAmanda Jacintha de Souza v. Atual Companhia Securitizadora de Créditos Financeiros

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.

Corpus matter record

Amanda Jacintha de Souza v. Atual Companhia Securitizadora de Créditos Financeiros

TJ Rio de Janeiro · Feb 24, 2026

Brazil Editorial impact: high fake citations bar referral other trial Bar Referral Professional

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Patrono presented jurisprudência inexistente in the appellate brief; court concluded it was likely created by AI and ordered disciplinary inquiry. Outcome: Bar Referral.

Why the court cared: The structured public record identifies fake citations and bar referral and records Bar Referral. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Bar Referral in TJ Rio de Janeiro. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Patrono presented jurisprudência inexistente in the appellate brief; court concluded it was likely created by AI and ordered disciplinary inquiry. Outcome: Bar Referral.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Bar Referral in TJ Rio de Janeiro. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtTJ Rio de Janeiro

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateFeb 24, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeBar Referral

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionYes

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Bar Referral

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Patrono presented jurisprudência inexistente in the appellate brief; court concluded it was likely created by AI and ordered disciplinary inquiry.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Amanda Jacintha de Souza v. Atual Companhia Securitizadora de Créditos Financeiros?: Fabricated: Case Law | Patrono presented jurisprudência inexistente in the appellate brief; court concluded it was likely created by AI and ordered disciplinary inquiry. Outcome: Bar Referral.
Why does Amanda Jacintha de Souza v. Atual Companhia Securitizadora de Créditos Financeiros matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Bar Referral in TJ Rio de Janeiro. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Amanda Jacintha de Souza v. Atual Companhia Securitizadora de Créditos Financeiros?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Amanda Jacintha de Souza v. Atual Companhia Securitizadora de Créditos Financeiros summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Ezequiel Cunha de Moura e outro v. Wallace de Moura SilvaTJ Rio de Janeiro · Mar 30, 2026same court · fake citations + bar referral Luiz Carlos Barboza Neves v. Banco Bradesco S.A.TJ Rio de Janeiro · Feb 23, 2026same court · fake citations + other Thalita Aparecida Araújo Rosa Campos v. Marcio Abreu RosaTJ Rio de Janeiro · May 6, 2026same court · fake citations + bar referral LiveVideo.AI Corp. v. RedstoneS.D. New York · Jun 9, 2026fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Mercado E Açougue Sao Lucas Eireli v Pluxee Beneficios BrasilTJ Parana · May 15, 2026fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Rivera v. Triad Props. Corp.N.D. Alabama · Mar 31, 2026fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source Suggest a correction to this record

Public-record statuspublic record, not an allegation-only entry

Indexing eligibilitypublicly indexable with evidence status disclosed

Published and maintained byManu Ayala · AI VortexIndependent legal AI risk intelligence

Corpus snapshot checked Aug 17, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Aug 17, 2026; latest tracked decision Aug 13, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Open TJ Rio de Janeiro profile Explore jurisdiction

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology