HomeCasesEzequiel Cunha de Moura e outro v. Wallace de Moura Silva

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Ezequiel Cunha de Moura e outro v. Wallace de Moura Silva

TJ-RJ · Mar 30, 2026

BrazilEditorial impact: highfake citationsbar referralcontracttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Petition cited an STJ acórdão by number (1654321) and reproduced a passage; court research showed no matching RJ acórdão and identified REsp 1.654.321/MG (and AREsp 1654321 of different origin), concluding the cited passage/acórdão does not exist as presented. Outcome: Bar Referral.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Bar Referral; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: Brazilian courts now refer attorneys to the OAB for fabricated citations; citation verification is not optional.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Brazilian courts now refer attorneys to the OAB for fabricated citations; citation verification is not optional.

Record details

CourtTJ-RJ

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateMar 30, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeBar Referral

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Bar Referral

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Petition cited an STJ acórdão by number (1654321) and reproduced a passage; court research showed no matching RJ acórdão and identified REsp 1.654.321/MG (and AREsp 1654321 of different origin), concluding the cited passage/acórdão does not exist as presented.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Ezequiel Cunha de Moura e outro v. Wallace de Moura Silva?: Fabricated: Case Law | Petition cited an STJ acórdão by number (1654321) and reproduced a passage; court research showed no matching RJ acórdão and identified REsp 1.654.321/MG (and AREsp 1654321 of different origin), concluding the cited passage/acórdão does not exist as presented. Outcome: Bar Referral.
Why does Ezequiel Cunha de Moura e outro v. Wallace de Moura Silva matter for legal AI risk?: Brazilian courts now refer attorneys to the OAB for fabricated citations; citation verification is not optional.
What does the public record establish about Ezequiel Cunha de Moura e outro v. Wallace de Moura Silva?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Ezequiel Cunha de Moura e outro v. Wallace de Moura Silva summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Krista C. Geddes v. LoanCare, LLC, et al.E.D. California · Apr 22, 2026fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Virgil v. Experian Information Solutions, et al.S.D. Indiana · Feb 12, 2026fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Jason M. Hatfield, P.A. v. Tony Pirani and Pirani Law PAW.D. Arkansas · Dec 3, 2025fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Keaau Development Partnership LLC v. LawrenceHawaii ICA · May 15, 2025fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Nexgen Pathology Services Ltd v. Darcueil DuncanHigh Court of Justice · Apr 30, 2025fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Withers v. City of AberdeenN.D. Mississippi · Jun 8, 2026fake citations + bar referral

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Brazilian courts now refer attorneys to the OAB for fabricated citations; citation verification is not optional.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Ezequiel Cunha de Moura e outro v. Wallace de Moura Silva?

Why does Ezequiel Cunha de Moura e outro v. Wallace de Moura Silva matter for legal AI risk?

Brazilian courts now refer attorneys to the OAB for fabricated citations; citation verification is not optional.

What does the public record establish about Ezequiel Cunha de Moura e outro v. Wallace de Moura Silva?

Which source supports this Ezequiel Cunha de Moura e outro v. Wallace de Moura Silva summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.