Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Anita Krishnakumar et al. v. Eichler Swim and Tennis Club
SC California · May 29, 2025
CA / stateEditorial impact: lowfake citationstorttrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant's opposition cites a nonexistent case, 'Ortiz v. Ford Motor Co. (2020) 50 Cal.App.5th 665'; court could not locate it and noted the citation corresponds to an unrelated costs case. Outcome: Argument lost on the merits in tentative ruling. The underlying motion was later withdrawn, with the result that the tentative ruling was not adopted.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Argument lost on the merits in tentative ruling; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- Withdrawing the motion does not erase fake citations; verify before filing because courts still note them on the record.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant's opposition cites a nonexistent case, 'Ortiz v. Ford Motor Co. (2020) 50 Cal.App.5th 665'; court could not locate it and noted the citation corresponds to an unrelated costs case. Outcome: Argument lost on the merits in tentative ruling. The underlying motion was later withdrawn, with the result that the tentative ruling was not adopted.
Operational lesson
Withdrawing the motion does not erase fake citations; verify before filing because courts still note them on the record.
Record details
CaliforniaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtSC California
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit9th Circuit
DateMay 29, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeArgument lost on the merits in tentative ruling
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Argument lost on the merits in tentative ruling
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant's opposition cites a nonexistent case, 'Ortiz v. Ford Motor Co. (2020) 50 Cal.App.5th 665'; court could not locate it and noted the citation corresponds to an unrelated costs case.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant attributes a fabricated quote to the nonexistent Ortiz case; court's Lexis search found the language only in Defendant's brief.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Anita Krishnakumar et al. v. Eichler Swim and Tennis Club?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant's opposition cites a nonexistent case, 'Ortiz v. Ford Motor Co. (2020) 50 Cal.App.5th 665'; court could not locate it and noted the citation corresponds to an unrelated costs case. Outcome: Argument lost on the merits in tentative ruling. The underlying motion was later withdrawn, with the result that the tentative ruling was not adopted.
- Why does Anita Krishnakumar et al. v. Eichler Swim and Tennis Club matter for legal AI risk?
- Withdrawing the motion does not erase fake citations; verify before filing because courts still note them on the record.
- What does the public record establish about Anita Krishnakumar et al. v. Eichler Swim and Tennis Club?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Anita Krishnakumar et al. v. Eichler Swim and Tennis Club summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.