HomeCasesAscent Management, Inc. et al v. Shell Oil Company et al

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Ascent Management, Inc. et al v. Shell Oil Company et al

Montgomery CC, Ohio · Apr 30, 2026

OH / stateEditorial impact: mediumfake citationsmisrepresented authoritypublished opinioncontract

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | November 5, 2024 filing cited 'Perrico v. Verizon, 2018-Ohio-3994.' Court found no such opinion on search and treated it as a fabricated citation. Outcome: Adverse Costs Order.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Adverse Costs Order; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority involving Unidentified with Adverse Costs Order in Montgomery CC, Ohio, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | November 5, 2024 filing cited 'Perrico v. Verizon, 2018-Ohio-3994.' Court found no such opinion on search and treated it as a fabricated citation. Outcome: Adverse Costs Order.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority involving Unidentified with Adverse Costs Order in Montgomery CC, Ohio, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

OhioSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtMontgomery CC, Ohio

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit6th Circuit

DateApr 30, 2026

AI toolUnidentified

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeAdverse Costs Order

Known amount$5,237

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Adverse Costs Order

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | November 5, 2024 filing cited 'Perrico v. Verizon, 2018-Ohio-3994.' Court found no such opinion on search and treated it as a fabricated citation.
Misrepresented: Case Law | December 3, 2024 filing cited 'Kyser v. Summit County Children Services, 2022-Ohio-1207,' but court's search showed the reporter corresponds to a different case.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation to 'In re Fuel Adjustment Clauses for Columbus S. Power Co. & Ohio Power Co., 41 Ohio St.2d 41' was misattributed; reporter corresponds to a different named opinion.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation to 'Baker v. Coast to Coast Manpower, LLC, 2020-Ohio-4533' corresponded to a different published decision on search.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Ascent Management, Inc. et al v. Shell Oil Company et al?: Fabricated: Case Law | November 5, 2024 filing cited 'Perrico v. Verizon, 2018-Ohio-3994.' Court found no such opinion on search and treated it as a fabricated citation. Outcome: Adverse Costs Order.
Why does Ascent Management, Inc. et al v. Shell Oil Company et al matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority involving Unidentified with Adverse Costs Order in Montgomery CC, Ohio, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Ascent Management, Inc. et al v. Shell Oil Company et al?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Ascent Management, Inc. et al v. Shell Oil Company et al summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Burlingame v. Argo Private Client Group Ltd, et al.N.D. Ohio · Jul 8, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + misrepresented authority Quandel Construction Group, Inc. v. Hunt Construction Group, Inc.S.D. Ohio · Mar 31, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + misrepresented authority Kettering Adventist Healthcare v. Sandra Collier, et al.S.D. Ohio · Feb 25, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + misrepresented authority Hector Salvatori v. The Huntington National BankS.D. Ohio · Jan 7, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + misrepresented authority Lahti v. Consensys Software Inc.S.D. Ohio · Aug 19, 2025same jurisdiction · fake citations + misrepresented authority Cames et al. v. Lowe's Home CentersM.D. Florida · Jul 16, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | November 5, 2024 filing cited 'Perrico v. Verizon, 2018-Ohio-3994.' Court found no such opinion on search and treated it as a fabricated citation. Outcome: Adverse Costs Order.

Operational lesson

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | November 5, 2024 filing cited 'Perrico v. Verizon, 2018-Ohio-3994.' Court found no such opinion on search and treated it as a fabricated citation.

Misrepresented: Case Law | December 3, 2024 filing cited 'Kyser v. Summit County Children Services, 2022-Ohio-1207,' but court's search showed the reporter corresponds to a different case.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation to 'In re Fuel Adjustment Clauses for Columbus S. Power Co. & Ohio Power Co., 41 Ohio St.2d 41' was misattributed; reporter corresponds to a different named opinion.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation to 'Baker v. Coast to Coast Manpower, LLC, 2020-Ohio-4533' corresponded to a different published decision on search.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Ascent Management, Inc. et al v. Shell Oil Company et al?

Fabricated: Case Law | November 5, 2024 filing cited 'Perrico v. Verizon, 2018-Ohio-3994.' Court found no such opinion on search and treated it as a fabricated citation. Outcome: Adverse Costs Order.

Why does Ascent Management, Inc. et al v. Shell Oil Company et al matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Ascent Management, Inc. et al v. Shell Oil Company et al?

Which source supports this Ascent Management, Inc. et al v. Shell Oil Company et al summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.