HomeCasesCames et al. v. Lowe's Home Centers

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Cames et al. v. Lowe's Home Centers

M.D. Florida · Jul 16, 2026

FL / federalEditorial impact: lowfake citationsmisrepresented authoritypublished opinioncontract

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Misrepresented: Case Law | Lowe's cited Shetty v. Palm Beach Radiation Oncology Assocs., Inc. but used a non-existent pinpoint (cited to p. 625) and misstated the scope of the case's holding; court identified the pin cite as erroneous. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Warning; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in M.D. Florida, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in M.D. Florida, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

FloridaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtM.D. Florida

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit11th Circuit

DateJul 16, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Lowe's cited Shetty v. Palm Beach Radiation Oncology Assocs., Inc. but used a non-existent pinpoint (cited to p. 625) and misstated the scope of the case's holding; court identified the pin cite as erroneous.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Lowe's provided a nonexistent pinpoint for Kroma, citing a page beyond the opinion's end and mischaracterizing the cited proposition.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Lowe's cited Lubin as a slip opinion citation despite the opinion being published and provided no pinpoint to support the argued proposition; court noted the odd citation practice among other citation defects.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Cames et al. v. Lowe's Home Centers?: Misrepresented: Case Law | Lowe's cited Shetty v. Palm Beach Radiation Oncology Assocs., Inc. but used a non-existent pinpoint (cited to p. 625) and misstated the scope of the case's holding; court identified the pin cite as erroneous. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Cames et al. v. Lowe's Home Centers matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in M.D. Florida, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Cames et al. v. Lowe's Home Centers?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Cames et al. v. Lowe's Home Centers summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Leafwell, Inc. v. The Doc App, Inc. (2)M.D. Florida · Jun 9, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority The Doc App, Inc. d/b/a My Florida Green v. Leafwell, Inc. (1)M.D. Florida · Nov 26, 2025same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Stringer v. White Cap Supply Holdings, LLCM.D. Florida · May 14, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Farag v. Persante et alM.D. Florida · Jan 26, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority De Ford, Bader, and Key v. James Koutoulas and LGBCoin, LTDM.D. Florida · Dec 2, 2025same court · fake citations + contract Charles C. Force v. Capital One, N.A., et al.M.D. Florida · Oct 15, 2025same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Lowe's provided a nonexistent pinpoint for Kroma, citing a page beyond the opinion's end and mischaracterizing the cited proposition.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Lowe's cited Lubin as a slip opinion citation despite the opinion being published and provided no pinpoint to support the argued proposition; court noted the odd citation practice among other citation defects.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Cames et al. v. Lowe's Home Centers?

Why does Cames et al. v. Lowe's Home Centers matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Cames et al. v. Lowe's Home Centers?

Which source supports this Cames et al. v. Lowe's Home Centers summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.