Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Ayinde v. Borough of Haringey
High Court · Apr 3, 2025
GBEditorial impact: highfake citationsmisrepresented authorityadministrativetrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Claimant cited a non-existent High Court case to support a duty to provide interim accommodation; the Court found it does not exist and rejected counsel's explanation. Outcome: Wasted costs order; Partial disallowance of Claimant’s costs; Order to send transcript to Bar Standards Board and Solicitors Regulation Authority.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Wasted costs order; Partial disallowance of Claimant’s costs; Order to send transcript to Bar Standards Board and Solicitors Regulation Authority; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- Both barrister and solicitor face wasted costs when fake cases slip through—dual-review is non-negotiable.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Claimant cited a non-existent High Court case to support a duty to provide interim accommodation; the Court found it does not exist and rejected counsel's explanation. Outcome: Wasted costs order; Partial disallowance of Claimant’s costs; Order to send transcript to Bar Standards Board and Solicitors Regulation Authority.
AI Use
The judgment states that the only other explanation for the fabricated cases was the use of artificial intelligence.
Hallucination Details
The following five nonexistent cases were cited:R (El Gendi) v Camden [2020] EWHC 2435 (Admin)R (Ibrahim) v Waltham Forest [2019] EWHC 1873R (H) v Ealing [2021] EWHC 939 (Admin)R (KN) v Barnet [2020] EWHC 1066 (Admin)R (Balogun) v Lambeth [2020] EWCA Civ. 1442
Ruling/Sanction
The court imposed wasted costs orders against both barrister and solicitor, reduced the claimant’s recoverable costs, and ordered the judgment to be provided to the BSB and SRA.
Operational lesson
Both barrister and solicitor face wasted costs when fake cases slip through—dual-review is non-negotiable.
Record details
CourtHigh Court
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateApr 3, 2025
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeWasted costs order; Partial disallowance of Claimant’s costs; Order to send transcript to Bar Standards Board and Solicitors Regulation Authority
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionYes
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
not established
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Procedural posture
Wasted costs order; Partial disallowance of Claimant’s costs; Order to send transcript to Bar Standards Board and Solicitors Regulation Authority
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
6 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Claimant cited a non-existent High Court case to support a duty to provide interim accommodation; the Court found it does not exist and rejected counsel's explanation.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Claimant cited a non-existent High Court case on failure to consider medical needs; the Court found the case was fake.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Claimant cited a non-existent High Court case alleging irrational failure to provide interim accommodation; the Court found the citation was fabricated.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Claimant cited a non-existent High Court case to support a fairness argument; the Court determined it does not exist.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Claimant cited a non-existent Court of Appeal authority to support fairness principles; the Court found the case was fabricated.
- Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Claimant asserted section 188(3) Housing Act 1996 imposes a mandatory duty to provide interim accommodation; the Court held s.188(3) is discretionary ('may'), so the submission was wrong.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Ayinde v. Borough of Haringey?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Claimant cited a non-existent High Court case to support a duty to provide interim accommodation; the Court found it does not exist and rejected counsel's explanation. Outcome: Wasted costs order; Partial disallowance of Claimant’s costs; Order to send transcript to Bar Standards Board and Solicitors Regulation Authority.
- Why does Ayinde v. Borough of Haringey matter for legal AI risk?
- Both barrister and solicitor face wasted costs when fake cases slip through—dual-review is non-negotiable.
- What does the public record establish about Ayinde v. Borough of Haringey?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Ayinde v. Borough of Haringey summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.