Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 27, 2026 路 Latest decision Oct 23, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Home/countries/United Kingdom
馃嚞馃嚙
Source-linked corpus view

United Kingdom

United Kingdom appears in 77 of 2,223 public corpus records (3.5%). This page describes the recorded dataset, not an incidence rate, prevalence of AI use, or a prediction of future outcomes.

Matched records77
Corpus denominator2,223
Source linked100%
Latest trackedOct 1, 2026
Evidence-based answer

What patterns appear in the public records associated with United Kingdom?

AI Vortex currently links 77 source-linked public matters associated with United Kingdom. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (63), Misrepresented authority (41) and Fabricated or altered quotations (16). Recorded responses and outcomes include No adjudicated consequence recorded (40), Monetary sanction (16) and Warning or admonishment (13). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the country.

Every count below links to the exact matching records. The linked source, subsequent docket history, and local procedural context remain controlling.

Leading issue signalFabricated authorities63 records
Leading recorded responseNo adjudicated consequence recorded40 records
Known USD amountsNone recorded0 known 路 16 unquantified
Recorded date rangeMay 29, 2023through Oct 1, 2026
Observed issue mix

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within a single matter.

Recorded consequences

How did courts or authorities respond?

Response categories can overlap and do not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

Participant context

Who appears in these matters?

Matter context

Which practice areas are represented?

Attribution status

How is AI involvement recorded?

Unspecified attribution is not evidence that a particular vendor was used.

Corpus evolution

When were these matters recorded?

Public records in this view

Showing the most recent 24 of 77 matching records.

FJ v Secretary of State for the Home DepartmentFirst-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) 路 GB 路 AI (implied, unspecified)
Oct 1, 2026
The King (on the application of Sergio Graft) v Willesden County CourtAdministrative Court 路 GB 路 AI (implied, unspecified)
Sep 22, 2026
NK (Namibia) v Secretary of State for the Home DepartmentUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) 路 Namibia; UK 路 ChatGPT
Sep 21, 2026
HT v Secretary of State for the Home DepartmentUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) 路 GB 路 No tool named in source
Sep 4, 2026
Solicitors Regulation Authority Ltd v Abhishek KumarSolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal 路 GB 路 Unidentified
Aug 25, 2026
Hoxha & Others (Tanveer Ahmed; fraudulent applications; procedure)Upper Tribunal (IAC) 路 GB 路 No tool named in source
Aug 21, 2026
Lodhia v Twelve TreesKing's Bench 路 GB 路 Unidentified
Jul 24, 2026
iHEAT.ME LTD v The Commissioners for His Majesty鈥檚 Revenue and CustomsFirst-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) 路 GB 路 Unidentified
Jul 23, 2026
Immigration CaseFirst-Tier Immigration Tribunal 路 GB 路 Unidentified
Jul 14, 2026
Tobosaru v Romania; Tofan v RomaniaHigh Court 路 GB 路 Unidentified
Jul 8, 2026
Habib & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home DepartmentUpper Tribunal 路 GB 路 No tool named in source
Jun 12, 2026
Re an Office-Holder; Cork v SmithChancery 路 GB 路 Unidentified
May 22, 2026
Golden Sphinx Limited v ItkinRoyal Court (Jersey) 路 GB 路 AI (implied, unspecified)
May 18, 2026
World Kuk Sool Association, Inc v Alex PaulIPO 路 GB 路 AI (implied, unspecified)
May 13, 2026
Omar Rafique v The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and CustomsUKFTT (Tax Chamber) 路 GB 路 AI (implied, unspecified)
May 6, 2026
Tuyunuklu v Akmal [2026] UKUT 174 (LC)UKUT (Lands Chamber) 路 GB 路 AI (implied, unspecified)
May 5, 2026
Mrs Sabrena Rodney v Gee'z Micro Bar & Pitstop & OthersCounty Court at Dudley 路 GB 路 Unidentified
Apr 23, 2026
Brook House (Henley) RTM Company Limited v Henley Brook LimitedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) 路 GB 路 No tool named in source
Apr 13, 2026
Wu Leshi v Cheung Long YinLands Tribunal 路 GB 路 AI (implied, unspecified)
Mar 20, 2026
David Jeffs v London Borough of LewishamFirst-tier Tribunal 路 GB 路 Unidentified
Mar 16, 2026
Kamal v Tax Policy AssociatesHigh Court 路 GB 路 AI (implied, unspecified)
Mar 11, 2026
Chevalier-Hernandez v Poplar Dock Management Company LtdFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) 路 GB 路 ChatGPT
Mar 9, 2026
Re A, B, C, D (Extension of assessment; Use of AI: hallucinations)Family Court Bournemouth 路 GB 路 Unidentified
Mar 5, 2026
Brightwaters Energy Limited v Eroton Exploration and Production Company LimitedHigh Court 路 GB 路 Unidentified
Feb 17, 2026
Open all matching records

Scope and limitation

This page groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish a judge鈥檚 general practices or sanction rate. For every entity type, the view is not a comparison against unobserved proceedings.

Indexing and evidence status

This public entity profile is indexable and meets the evidence-depth baseline of at least 3 source-linked records.