HomeCasesB., V. E. v. C., B. R. Y.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

B., V. E. v. C., B. R. Y.

CA Córdoba · Sep 5, 2025

ArgentinaEditorial impact: lowfake citationscontractappellate

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Cita de Cámara local indicada en el recurso que no fue localizada: Cám. Civ. y Com. de 1ª Nom. de Córdoba, 'Pérez, R. c/ S., J. y otros s/ Posesión veinteañal', 05/06/2020. Outcome: Counsel's Work not Counted for Costs. El tribunal verificó que varias sentencias invocadas por la recurrente no pudieron ser halladas en repertorios oficiales; asumió, por el beneficio de la duda, que ello provino del mal uso de herramientas de IA y advirtió la obligación profesional de verificar fuentes. Se impone recomendación al letrado y se declaran inoficiosos sus trabajos en el recurso (sin condena disciplinaria formal).

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Counsel's Work not Counted for Costs; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: Losing fees on the entire appeal is the new price of unverified AI research — treat cite-checking as billable QA.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Losing fees on the entire appeal is the new price of unverified AI research — treat cite-checking as billable QA.

Record details

CourtCA Córdoba

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateSep 5, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeCounsel's Work not Counted for Costs

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Counsel's Work not Counted for Costs

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

8 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Cita de Cámara local indicada en el recurso que no fue localizada: Cám. Civ. y Com. de 1ª Nom. de Córdoba, 'Pérez, R. c/ S., J. y otros s/ Posesión veinteañal', 05/06/2020.
Fabricated: Case Law | Sentencia federal citada por la parte no verificada en repertorios: CNCiv., Sala F, 'M., N. c/ M., R. y otros s/ Prescripción Adquisitiva', 14/11/2017.
Fabricated: Case Law | Otra referencia de cámara federal invocada que no pudo comprobarse: CNCiv., Sala G, 'S., F. c/D., M. J. s/ Prescripción Adquisitiva', 28/08/2018.
Fabricated: Case Law | Cita invocada por la recurrente que no pudo comprobarse en repertorios: CSJN, 'Quiroga, Nicasio c/ Provincia de Buenos Aires s/ Usucapión', señalada como Fallos 325:475 del 05/03/2002.
Fabricated: Case Law | Cita jurisdiccional provincial indicada por la recurrente no verificada: TSJ, Sala Civil y Comercial, 'Pérez, Juan c/ García, María - Usucapión', sentencia del 15/05/2023.
Fabricated: Case Law | Cita señalada pero inexistente en búsquedas: TSJ, Sala Civil y Comercial, 'Martínez, Ana c/ Gobierno de la Provincia de Córdoba - Nulidad', sentencia del 18/02/2022.
Fabricated: Case Law | Fallo referido por la parte que no pudo ser corroborado: TSJ, Sala Civil y Comercial, 'Gómez, Laura c/ Empresa de Transporte - Daños y Perjuicios', Sentencia del 10/04/2024.
Fabricated: Case Law | Referencia jurisprudencial citada por la recurrente no hallada: 'Fernández, Carlos c/ Banco XYZ - Nulidad de Acto Jurídico' (sin fecha ni asiento verificable).

Questions this record answers

What happened in B., V. E. v. C., B. R. Y.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Cita de Cámara local indicada en el recurso que no fue localizada: Cám. Civ. y Com. de 1ª Nom. de Córdoba, 'Pérez, R. c/ S., J. y otros s/ Posesión veinteañal', 05/06/2020. Outcome: Counsel's Work not Counted for Costs. El tribunal verificó que varias sentencias invocadas por la recurrente no pudieron ser halladas en repertorios oficiales; asumió, por el beneficio de la duda, que ello provino del mal uso de herramientas de IA y advirtió la obligación profesional de verificar fuentes. Se impone recomendación al letrado y se declaran inoficiosos sus trabajos en el recurso (sin condena disciplinaria formal).
Why does B., V. E. v. C., B. R. Y. matter for legal AI risk?: Losing fees on the entire appeal is the new price of unverified AI research — treat cite-checking as billable QA.
What does the public record establish about B., V. E. v. C., B. R. Y.?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this B., V. E. v. C., B. R. Y. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

P-Three Development, LLC v. Therm Flo, Inc.CA Illinois · Jun 30, 2026fake citations + contract · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Cavalry SPV I, LLC v. James K. Bernard Jr.CA Illinois · Jun 26, 2026fake citations + contract · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Trina R. Patterson v. Digital Federal Credit UnionCA California (4d) · Jun 23, 2026fake citations + contract · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)FHMC, LLC et al. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc.CA Arizona (1d) · Jun 22, 2026fake citations + contract · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Kendall E. Scheer v. Scheer Farms, LLCCA Kansas · Jun 5, 2026fake citations + contract · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Christian Lavell Jennings v. Vandergriff HondaCA Texas · May 28, 2026fake citations + contract · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Losing fees on the entire appeal is the new price of unverified AI research — treat cite-checking as billable QA.

Tracked discrepancy record

8 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Sentencia federal citada por la parte no verificada en repertorios: CNCiv., Sala F, 'M., N. c/ M., R. y otros s/ Prescripción Adquisitiva', 14/11/2017.

Fabricated: Case Law | Otra referencia de cámara federal invocada que no pudo comprobarse: CNCiv., Sala G, 'S., F. c/D., M. J. s/ Prescripción Adquisitiva', 28/08/2018.

Fabricated: Case Law | Cita invocada por la recurrente que no pudo comprobarse en repertorios: CSJN, 'Quiroga, Nicasio c/ Provincia de Buenos Aires s/ Usucapión', señalada como Fallos 325:475 del 05/03/2002.

Fabricated: Case Law | Cita jurisdiccional provincial indicada por la recurrente no verificada: TSJ, Sala Civil y Comercial, 'Pérez, Juan c/ García, María - Usucapión', sentencia del 15/05/2023.

Fabricated: Case Law | Cita señalada pero inexistente en búsquedas: TSJ, Sala Civil y Comercial, 'Martínez, Ana c/ Gobierno de la Provincia de Córdoba - Nulidad', sentencia del 18/02/2022.

Fabricated: Case Law | Fallo referido por la parte que no pudo ser corroborado: TSJ, Sala Civil y Comercial, 'Gómez, Laura c/ Empresa de Transporte - Daños y Perjuicios', Sentencia del 10/04/2024.

Fabricated: Case Law | Referencia jurisprudencial citada por la recurrente no hallada: 'Fernández, Carlos c/ Banco XYZ - Nulidad de Acto Jurídico' (sin fecha ni asiento verificable).

Questions this record answers

What happened in B., V. E. v. C., B. R. Y.?

Why does B., V. E. v. C., B. R. Y. matter for legal AI risk?

Losing fees on the entire appeal is the new price of unverified AI research — treat cite-checking as billable QA.

What does the public record establish about B., V. E. v. C., B. R. Y.?

Which source supports this B., V. E. v. C., B. R. Y. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.