Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Barari v. Burgess
CA Arizona (1d) · Jun 26, 2026
AZ / stateEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationsmisrepresented authorityfamily
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a case that does not exist — a 'hallucinated' case — which the court identified as a fabricated citation. Outcome: Brief Struck.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Brief Struck; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Brief Struck in CA Arizona (1d), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a case that does not exist — a 'hallucinated' case — which the court identified as a fabricated citation. Outcome: Brief Struck.
Operational lesson
This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Brief Struck in CA Arizona (1d), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
ArizonaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtCA Arizona (1d)
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit9th Circuit
DateJun 26, 2026
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeBrief Struck
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
not established
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Procedural posture
Brief Struck
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a case that does not exist — a 'hallucinated' case — which the court identified as a fabricated citation.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Numerous inaccurate citations (about 24 of 52) that misstate case facts, holdings, and rules and attribute principles to cases that do not support them.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Barari v. Burgess?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a case that does not exist — a 'hallucinated' case — which the court identified as a fabricated citation. Outcome: Brief Struck.
- Why does Barari v. Burgess matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Brief Struck in CA Arizona (1d), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Barari v. Burgess?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Barari v. Burgess summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.