AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
Search free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Nov 14, 2026 · Latest decision Nov 8, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesWRI Summit REIT LP v. Kuerschner
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

WRI Summit REIT LP v. Kuerschner

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0), which credits Jesse Schaefer; document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

Cite this record

CA Arizona (1d) · Aug 10, 2026

AZ / stateEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authorityMonetary
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant quoted Burton as containing language about 'manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons,' which the court found does not appear in Burton. Outcome: Adverse Costs Order.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Adverse Costs Order. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Adverse Costs Order in CA Arizona (1d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant quoted Burton as containing language about 'manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons,' which the court found does not appear in Burton. Outcome: Adverse Costs Order.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Adverse Costs Order in CA Arizona (1d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

ArizonaSingle-state evidence scope
Explore AZOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtCA Arizona (1d)
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit9th Circuit
DateAug 10, 2026
First seenAug 16, 2026 (in this dataset)
AI toolNo tool named in source
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeAdverse Costs Order
Known amountcosts ordered, amount not stated
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Adverse Costs Order

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

8 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant quoted Burton as containing language about 'manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons,' which the court found does not appear in Burton.
  2. False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant attributed a de novo review statement re § 12-350 to Bennett that the cited paragraph does not contain.
  3. False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant cited Brown for a due-process rule ('Rulings which prevent a party from presenting evidence strike at the heart of due process') though Brown is a 1998 appellate decision and does not contain that language.
  4. Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a case the court could not locate (appears non-existent in Arizona appellate reports).
  5. Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant asserted Takieh reversed a fee sanction for failure to make explicit findings under § 12-350; court found Takieh did not contain that language and in fact affirmed the sanction.
  6. Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant represented Hertz as a published, citable opinion when it is an unpublished memorandum decision and cannot be cited for persuasive value.
  7. Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited Starr Pass with incorrect reporter number and date (miscitation).
  8. Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Appellant incorrectly asserted a rule-based doctrinal requirement about Rule 201 (judicial notice) that misstated the legal norm.

Questions this record answers

What happened in WRI Summit REIT LP v. Kuerschner?
False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant quoted Burton as containing language about 'manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons,' which the court found does not appear in Burton. Outcome: Adverse Costs Order.
Why does WRI Summit REIT LP v. Kuerschner matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Adverse Costs Order in CA Arizona (1d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about WRI Summit REIT LP v. Kuerschner?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this WRI Summit REIT LP v. Kuerschner summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Varela v. HauserCA Arizona (1d) · Sep 17, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsNgaruiya v. GillCA Arizona (1d) · Jun 16, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsDineen/Shibata v. KotchkaCA Arizona (1d) · Jul 15, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsBarari v. BurgessCA Arizona (1d) · Jun 26, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsAmerican Leadership Academy, et al. v. Kristina Sherburne, et al.CA Arizona (1d) · Oct 23, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsGarciduenas v. Matrix New World Engineering, Inc.CA Arizona (1d) · Jul 23, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesBolden v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co (In re: Eric Chibueze Nwaubani)CA Fourth Circuit · Mar 11, 2026fake citations + published opinion · same recorded tool: No tool named in source

This record involves a self-represented party. See all pro se litigant AI hallucination decisions in the corpus, with counts by year, country and outcome.

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.