Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
BKA Holdings v. Sam
CA Illinois · Sep 16, 2025
IL / stateEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationscontractappellate
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | A third cited authority in the reply brief was AI-generated and non-existent; the court treated the repeated reliance on fabricated cases as abusive use of AI and struck the brief. Outcome: Plaintiff awarded attorney fees and costs for spotting hallucinated authority.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Plaintiff awarded attorney fees and costs for spotting hallucinated authority; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Plaintiff awarded attorney fees and costs for spotting hallucinated authority in CA Illinois, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | A third cited authority in the reply brief was AI-generated and non-existent; the court treated the repeated reliance on fabricated cases as abusive use of AI and struck the brief. Outcome: Plaintiff awarded attorney fees and costs for spotting hallucinated authority.
Operational lesson
This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Plaintiff awarded attorney fees and costs for spotting hallucinated authority in CA Illinois, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
IllinoisSingle-state evidence scope
CourtCA Illinois
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit7th Circuit
DateSep 16, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomePlaintiff awarded attorney fees and costs for spotting hallucinated authority
Known amount$1
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Plaintiff awarded attorney fees and costs for spotting hallucinated authority
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | A third cited authority in the reply brief was AI-generated and non-existent; the court treated the repeated reliance on fabricated cases as abusive use of AI and struck the brief.
- Fabricated: Case Law | A fourth AI-generated case citation was included in the reply brief; the court noted four hallucinated cases and granted plaintiff's sanctions motion.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Defendants' reply brief cited an AI-generated, non-existent case; the court found the authority hallucinated and struck the reply brief as part of granting sanctions.
- Fabricated: Case Law | A second AI-generated case citation appeared in defendants' reply brief; the court identified it as hallucinated and relied on the existence of multiple fabricated cases in granting sanctions.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in BKA Holdings v. Sam?
- Fabricated: Case Law | A third cited authority in the reply brief was AI-generated and non-existent; the court treated the repeated reliance on fabricated cases as abusive use of AI and struck the brief. Outcome: Plaintiff awarded attorney fees and costs for spotting hallucinated authority.
- Why does BKA Holdings v. Sam matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Plaintiff awarded attorney fees and costs for spotting hallucinated authority in CA Illinois, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about BKA Holdings v. Sam?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this BKA Holdings v. Sam summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.