Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
[Plaintiff] v. Webb Chevrolet, Inc., et al.
CA Illinois · Feb 9, 2026
IL / stateEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationsfabricated quotescontract
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a specific quote to Fox v. Heiman that does not appear in that opinion; court noted Fox does not mention section 2-619 or contain the quoted language. Outcome: Order to show cause.
- Why the court cared
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a specific quote to Fox v. Heiman that does not appear in that opinion; court noted Fox does not mention section 2-619 or contain the quoted language. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff asserted Concepcion supports limitations on arbitration protecting consumer claims; court observed Concepcion does not include the propositions plaintiff attributed to it. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff claimed Kinkel and Gallagher stand for broad public-policy limits on arbitration clauses; court found neither case supports the sweeping propositions plaintiff attributed to them. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a nonexistent Illinois opinion; court searched and found no case by this name and the cited volume/page corresponded to an unrelated criminal opinion. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a nonexistent case title/citation; court found the actual opinion at that citation was a different case and no 'Sears v. Illinois Central Savings & Loan' exists. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a case by name and citation that do not exist in Illinois or elsewhere; court's search returned no such authority. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a nonexistent opinion and attributed a specific holding; court found no such case or holding at the citation provided. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a case title/citation that matched other unrelated opinions; court found no support for the claimed arbitration-related holding. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted language purportedly from Smith v. Airoom that does not appear in the opinion; court found the quoted language and the asserted principles absent from Smith. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a holding to Keefe that the case does not contain (re: section 2-619 not a responsive pleading); court found Keefe does not contain the quoted language or discuss section 2-619.
- Why it matters now
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA Illinois, with the listed outcome: Order to show cause.
Why this matter is tracked
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a specific quote to Fox v. Heiman that does not appear in that opinion; court noted Fox does not mention section 2-619 or contain the quoted language. Outcome: Order to show cause.
Operational lesson
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA Illinois, with the listed outcome: Order to show cause.
Record details
IllinoisSingle-state evidence scope
CourtCA Illinois
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit7th Circuit
DateFeb 9, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeOrder to show cause
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Order to show cause
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
10 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a specific quote to Fox v. Heiman that does not appear in that opinion; court noted Fox does not mention section 2-619 or contain the quoted language.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff asserted Concepcion supports limitations on arbitration protecting consumer claims; court observed Concepcion does not include the propositions plaintiff attributed to it.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff claimed Kinkel and Gallagher stand for broad public-policy limits on arbitration clauses; court found neither case supports the sweeping propositions plaintiff attributed to them.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a nonexistent Illinois opinion; court searched and found no case by this name and the cited volume/page corresponded to an unrelated criminal opinion.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a nonexistent case title/citation; court found the actual opinion at that citation was a different case and no 'Sears v. Illinois Central Savings & Loan' exists.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a case by name and citation that do not exist in Illinois or elsewhere; court's search returned no such authority.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a nonexistent opinion and attributed a specific holding; court found no such case or holding at the citation provided.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a case title/citation that matched other unrelated opinions; court found no support for the claimed arbitration-related holding.
Show 2 additional discrepancies
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted language purportedly from Smith v. Airoom that does not appear in the opinion; court found the quoted language and the asserted principles absent from Smith.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a holding to Keefe that the case does not contain (re: section 2-619 not a responsive pleading); court found Keefe does not contain the quoted language or discuss section 2-619.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in [Plaintiff] v. Webb Chevrolet, Inc., et al.?
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a specific quote to Fox v. Heiman that does not appear in that opinion; court noted Fox does not mention section 2-619 or contain the quoted language. Outcome: Order to show cause.
- Why does [Plaintiff] v. Webb Chevrolet, Inc., et al. matter for legal AI risk?
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA Illinois, with the listed outcome: Order to show cause.
- What does the public record establish about [Plaintiff] v. Webb Chevrolet, Inc., et al.?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this [Plaintiff] v. Webb Chevrolet, Inc., et al. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.