Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Case No. 525309-08-22
Jerusalem Enforcement and Collection Authority · Jun 30, 2025
IsraelEditorial impact: lowfake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authorityadministrative
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Legal Norm | Counsel quoted and relied on a non-existent subsection 66א(א1) purportedly barring exit bans below 40,000 NIS absent special reasons; the Court could not locate such subsection or text. Outcome: Warning.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Warning; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- Verify statutory subsections and amendment dates directly — AI routinely invents code sections that sound plausible.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Legal Norm | Counsel quoted and relied on a non-existent subsection 66א(א1) purportedly barring exit bans below 40,000 NIS absent special reasons; the Court could not locate such subsection or text. Outcome: Warning.
Operational lesson
Verify statutory subsections and amendment dates directly — AI routinely invents code sections that sound plausible.
Record details
CourtJerusalem Enforcement and Collection Authority
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateJun 30, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeWarning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Warning
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Legal Norm | Counsel quoted and relied on a non-existent subsection 66א(א1) purportedly barring exit bans below 40,000 NIS absent special reasons; the Court could not locate such subsection or text.
- Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Counsel asserted that Amendment 47 to the Execution Law took effect on 15.02.2020 and governs exit-ban thresholds; the Court notes Amendment 47 is from 03.08.2015 and concerns discharge for 'limited means' debtors, not exit bans.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Case No. 525309-08-22?
- Fabricated: Legal Norm | Counsel quoted and relied on a non-existent subsection 66א(א1) purportedly barring exit bans below 40,000 NIS absent special reasons; the Court could not locate such subsection or text. Outcome: Warning.
- Why does Case No. 525309-08-22 matter for legal AI risk?
- Verify statutory subsections and amendment dates directly — AI routinely invents code sections that sound plausible.
- What does the public record establish about Case No. 525309-08-22?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Case No. 525309-08-22 summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.