HomeCasesChelsea Montes v. Suns Legacy Partners LLC

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Chelsea Montes v. Suns Legacy Partners LLC

D. Arizona · Mar 31, 2026

AZ / federalEditorial impact: lowfake citationsfabricated quotesemploymenttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Response to motion to dismiss included 'McIntyre v. Phx. Newspapers, Inc.' citation that was fabricated/mis-cited as filed. Outcome: Adverse Costs Order; CLE; Notification.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Adverse Costs Order; CLE; Notification; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: Mandatory CLE plus costs attaches once fabricated citations appear across multiple filings — one audit would catch the pattern.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Response to motion to dismiss included 'McIntyre v. Phx. Newspapers, Inc.' citation that was fabricated/mis-cited as filed. Outcome: Adverse Costs Order; CLE; Notification.

Operational lesson

Mandatory CLE plus costs attaches once fabricated citations appear across multiple filings — one audit would catch the pattern.

Record details

ArizonaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Arizona

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateMar 31, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeAdverse Costs Order; CLE; Notification

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Adverse Costs Order; CLE; Notification

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

8 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Response to motion to dismiss included 'McIntyre v. Phx. Newspapers, Inc.' citation that was fabricated/mis-cited as filed.
Fabricated: Case Law | Reply in support of anonymity contained multiple 'Doe v. ...' citations (e.g., Amazon) presented with Westlaw/West reporter info that did not exist as cited and were removed or corrected.
Fabricated: Case Law | Reply included 'Doe v. Maricopa County Community College District, 2017 WL 4460441 (D. Ariz. Oct. 5, 2017)' that counsel could not identify as a real corresponding opinion; court treated it as fabricated.
Fabricated: Case Law | Reply cited 'Doe v. Northrop Grumman Sys. Corp., 2022 WL 3447983 (E.D. Va. Aug. 17, 2022)' as authority; court found the citation was misreferenced/ fabricated as used.
Fabricated: Case Law | Initial complaint cited a non-existent case and parenthetical about Equal Pay Act plausibility; court found the citation fictitious.
Fabricated: Case Law | Response to motion to dismiss cited 'Pizzo v. City of Chandler' as a 2021 D. Ariz. opinion; court determined the citation was fabricated as presented.
False Quotes: Case Law | Filings contained quoted phrases attributed to Ahanchian that did not appear verbatim in the opinion; court found they were paraphrased or presented as false quotations.
False Quotes: Case Law | Filings included fabricated/direct-quotation-style phrases attributed to other real cases (e.g., Briones, Sibley, Valley Eng'rs) that were not direct quotes in those opinions.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Chelsea Montes v. Suns Legacy Partners LLC?: Fabricated: Case Law | Response to motion to dismiss included 'McIntyre v. Phx. Newspapers, Inc.' citation that was fabricated/mis-cited as filed. Outcome: Adverse Costs Order; CLE; Notification.
Why does Chelsea Montes v. Suns Legacy Partners LLC matter for legal AI risk?: Mandatory CLE plus costs attaches once fabricated citations appear across multiple filings — one audit would catch the pattern.
What does the public record establish about Chelsea Montes v. Suns Legacy Partners LLC?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Chelsea Montes v. Suns Legacy Partners LLC summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Jodell Dodge v. FirstService Residential Arizona LLCD. Arizona · Dec 8, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Michael L. Ruiz v. Magellan Financial & Insurance ServicesD. Arizona · Jul 8, 2026same court · fabricated quotes + employment Oliver Complot and Corina Tolamaa v. Credit Control, LLC and LVNV Funding LLCD. Arizona · Jun 23, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Perry v. Merrick Bank CorporationD. Arizona · Jun 9, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Perry v. Exeter Finance LLCD. Arizona · Feb 26, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Gerow v. FalconeD. Arizona · Feb 20, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Response to motion to dismiss included 'McIntyre v. Phx. Newspapers, Inc.' citation that was fabricated/mis-cited as filed. Outcome: Adverse Costs Order; CLE; Notification.

Operational lesson

Mandatory CLE plus costs attaches once fabricated citations appear across multiple filings — one audit would catch the pattern.

Record details

ArizonaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Arizona

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateMar 31, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeAdverse Costs Order; CLE; Notification

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

8 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Response to motion to dismiss included 'McIntyre v. Phx. Newspapers, Inc.' citation that was fabricated/mis-cited as filed.

Fabricated: Case Law | Reply in support of anonymity contained multiple 'Doe v. ...' citations (e.g., Amazon) presented with Westlaw/West reporter info that did not exist as cited and were removed or corrected.

Fabricated: Case Law | Reply included 'Doe v. Maricopa County Community College District, 2017 WL 4460441 (D. Ariz. Oct. 5, 2017)' that counsel could not identify as a real corresponding opinion; court treated it as fabricated.

Fabricated: Case Law | Reply cited 'Doe v. Northrop Grumman Sys. Corp., 2022 WL 3447983 (E.D. Va. Aug. 17, 2022)' as authority; court found the citation was misreferenced/ fabricated as used.

Fabricated: Case Law | Initial complaint cited a non-existent case and parenthetical about Equal Pay Act plausibility; court found the citation fictitious.

Fabricated: Case Law | Response to motion to dismiss cited 'Pizzo v. City of Chandler' as a 2021 D. Ariz. opinion; court determined the citation was fabricated as presented.

False Quotes: Case Law | Filings contained quoted phrases attributed to Ahanchian that did not appear verbatim in the opinion; court found they were paraphrased or presented as false quotations.

False Quotes: Case Law | Filings included fabricated/direct-quotation-style phrases attributed to other real cases (e.g., Briones, Sibley, Valley Eng'rs) that were not direct quotes in those opinions.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Chelsea Montes v. Suns Legacy Partners LLC?

Fabricated: Case Law | Response to motion to dismiss included 'McIntyre v. Phx. Newspapers, Inc.' citation that was fabricated/mis-cited as filed. Outcome: Adverse Costs Order; CLE; Notification.

Why does Chelsea Montes v. Suns Legacy Partners LLC matter for legal AI risk?

Mandatory CLE plus costs attaches once fabricated citations appear across multiple filings — one audit would catch the pattern.

What does the public record establish about Chelsea Montes v. Suns Legacy Partners LLC?

Which source supports this Chelsea Montes v. Suns Legacy Partners LLC summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.