HomeCasesPerry v. Merrick Bank Corporation

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 76/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Perry v. Merrick Bank Corporation

D. Arizona · Jun 9, 2026

AZ / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsfabricated quotesother

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Court noted Plaintiff previously filed at least one 'hallucinated citation' (a fabricated case citation) in prior litigation (Perry v. Exeter Finance LLC).

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is the response recorded in the linked source; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with a recorded judicial response in D. Arizona, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Court noted Plaintiff previously filed at least one 'hallucinated citation' (a fabricated case citation) in prior litigation (Perry v. Exeter Finance LLC).

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with a recorded judicial response in D. Arizona, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

ArizonaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Arizona

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateJun 9, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Court noted Plaintiff previously filed at least one 'hallucinated citation' (a fabricated case citation) in prior litigation (Perry v. Exeter Finance LLC).
False Quotes: Case Law | Court noted Plaintiff previously included 'fake quotations' misattributed to real cases in prior filings (Perry v. Exeter Finance LLC).

Questions this record answers

What happened in Perry v. Merrick Bank Corporation?: Fabricated: Case Law | Court noted Plaintiff previously filed at least one 'hallucinated citation' (a fabricated case citation) in prior litigation (Perry v. Exeter Finance LLC).
Why does Perry v. Merrick Bank Corporation matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with a recorded judicial response in D. Arizona, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Perry v. Merrick Bank Corporation?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Perry v. Merrick Bank Corporation summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Oliver Complot and Corina Tolamaa v. Credit Control, LLC and LVNV Funding LLCD. Arizona · Jun 23, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Perry v. Exeter Finance LLCD. Arizona · Feb 26, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Gerow v. FalconeD. Arizona · Feb 20, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Pearl Gardner v. Nationstar Mortgage LLCD. Arizona · Jan 9, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Erik Arthur Otteson v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NAD. Arizona · Jul 17, 2026same court · pro se + fabricated quotes Bathsheba Nichole Adams v. Kiewit Infrastructure West Company, et al.D. Arizona · Apr 29, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Court noted Plaintiff previously filed at least one 'hallucinated citation' (a fabricated case citation) in prior litigation (Perry v. Exeter Finance LLC).

Operational lesson

Record details

ArizonaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Arizona

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateJun 9, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Court noted Plaintiff previously filed at least one 'hallucinated citation' (a fabricated case citation) in prior litigation (Perry v. Exeter Finance LLC).

False Quotes: Case Law | Court noted Plaintiff previously included 'fake quotations' misattributed to real cases in prior filings (Perry v. Exeter Finance LLC).

Questions this record answers

What happened in Perry v. Merrick Bank Corporation?

Fabricated: Case Law | Court noted Plaintiff previously filed at least one 'hallucinated citation' (a fabricated case citation) in prior litigation (Perry v. Exeter Finance LLC).

Why does Perry v. Merrick Bank Corporation matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Perry v. Merrick Bank Corporation?

Which source supports this Perry v. Merrick Bank Corporation summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.