HomeCasesChoi v. Slopinski

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 76/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Choi v. Slopinski

SC British Columbia · Nov 10, 2025

CanadaEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsothertrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on 'Mullins v. McMaster University, 2020 ONSC 2403' (cited as a Supreme Court of Canada decision); defendants' counsel advised the court it is not a real case and the court noted it is not real.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on 'Mullins v. McMaster University, 2020 ONSC 2403' (cited as a Supreme Court of Canada decision); defendants' counsel advised the court it is not a real case and the court noted it is not real.
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in SC British Columbia, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in SC British Columbia, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

Record details

CourtSC British Columbia

Jurisdictioninternational

Circuit4th Circuit

DateNov 10, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on 'Mullins v. McMaster University, 2020 ONSC 2403' (cited as a Supreme Court of Canada decision); defendants' counsel advised the court it is not a real case and the court noted it is not real.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Choi v. Slopinski?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on 'Mullins v. McMaster University, 2020 ONSC 2403' (cited as a Supreme Court of Canada decision); defendants' counsel advised the court it is not a real case and the court noted it is not real.
Why does Choi v. Slopinski matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in SC British Columbia, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
What does the public record establish about Choi v. Slopinski?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Choi v. Slopinski summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Krivaia v. HungerfordSC British Columbia · Mar 11, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Zou v. Miracon Development Inc.SC British Columbia · Jan 20, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations J.R.V. v. N.L.V.SC British Columbia · Jun 19, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Singh v. Director of the Residential Tenancy BranchSC British Columbia · Mar 23, 2026same court · pro se + trial Birsingh v. Little Wheel, LLC, et al.M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 10, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Kevin Krzeminski v. Janine McQuillanSC New York · Jul 6, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in SC British Columbia, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Choi v. Slopinski?

Why does Choi v. Slopinski matter for legal AI risk?

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in SC British Columbia, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

What does the public record establish about Choi v. Slopinski?

Which source supports this Choi v. Slopinski summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.