AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 25, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesCohen v. State of Israel et al.
Evidence review: primary document limited. The primary document was retrieved, but one or more case-level facts could not be tied to a page-located passage. The structured corpus baseline is preserved without upgrading those claims.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Cohen v. State of Israel et al.

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

Jerusalem District Court · Nov 12, 2025

IsraelEditorial impact: lowfake citationsmisrepresented authoritycontracttrialMonetaryCase Dismissed
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | Misrepresented exhibits Outcome: Claim dismissed at the threshold; the plaintiff ordered to pay ILS 16,000 costs to the defendants (ILS 8,000 each to the State and to defendant 2) and his counsel ILS 4,000 in personal costs to the State treasury for relying on invented authorities (paras 26-28, 61).

Why the court cared
Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | Misrepresented exhibits || Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel based the claims on 11 judgments of which only 2 exist in the legal databases (9 invented); asked by the court, counsel replied that an AI tool was used to write the claims and called it a good-faith error.
Why it matters now
Courts will impose adverse costs the moment a single AI fabrication slips through; enforce a signed verification checklist before filing.

Why this matter is tracked

Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | Misrepresented exhibits Outcome: Claim dismissed at the threshold; the plaintiff ordered to pay ILS 16,000 costs to the defendants (ILS 8,000 each to the State and to defendant 2) and his counsel ILS 4,000 in personal costs to the State treasury for relying on invented authorities (paras 26-28, 61).

Operational lesson

Courts will impose adverse costs the moment a single AI fabrication slips through; enforce a signed verification checklist before filing.

Record details

CourtJerusalem District Court
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateNov 12, 2025
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeClaim dismissed at the threshold; the plaintiff ordered to pay ILS 16,000 costs to the defendants (ILS 8,000 each to the State and to defendant 2) and his counsel ILS 4,000 in personal costs to the State treasury for relying on invented authorities (paras 26-28, 61)
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Claim dismissed at the threshold; the plaintiff ordered to pay ILS 16,000 costs to the defendants (ILS 8,000 each to the State and to defendant 2) and his counsel ILS 4,000 in personal costs to the State treasury for relying on invented authorities (paras 26-28, 61)

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | Misrepresented exhibits
  2. Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel based the claims on 11 judgments of which only 2 exist in the legal databases (9 invented); asked by the court, counsel replied that an AI tool was used to write the claims and called it a good-faith error.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Cohen v. State of Israel et al.?
Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | Misrepresented exhibits Outcome: Claim dismissed at the threshold; the plaintiff ordered to pay ILS 16,000 costs to the defendants (ILS 8,000 each to the State and to defendant 2) and his counsel ILS 4,000 in personal costs to the State treasury for relying on invented authorities (paras 26-28, 61).
Why does Cohen v. State of Israel et al. matter for legal AI risk?
Courts will impose adverse costs the moment a single AI fabrication slips through; enforce a signed verification checklist before filing.
What does the public record establish about Cohen v. State of Israel et al.?
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Cohen v. State of Israel et al. summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Angela Williams, et al. v. Jamal Rashid, et al.D. Nevada · Jun 9, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: UnidentifiedPrincipal, Woodland House School & Ors. v. Shakeel Ahmad MalikHC Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh, Srinagar · Jun 6, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: UnidentifiedStrategic Funding Source, Inc. v. STI-NY, LLCSC New York · May 28, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: UnidentifiedJoshua Harris v. Pinnacle Bank (2)N.D. Mississippi · May 7, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: UnidentifiedООО «Точка опоры» v. ООО «ЦСС»West Siberian District AC · May 5, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: UnidentifiedAscent Management, Inc. et al v. Shell Oil Company et alMontgomery CC, Ohio · Apr 30, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: Unidentified
Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.