Costarte Eireli Me. v. Churrascão Gaúcho Restaurante Ltda.
TJ Parana · Nov 6, 2025
What happened in this matter?
The appellant alleged the trial judge's sentence was entirely produced by artificial intelligence and should be annulled. The appellate court held the accusation required unequivocal proof and found none: any AI use was limited to drafting the procedural report and is authorized by Decreto Judiciário nº 421/2024/TJPR; the fundamentation and dispositive were authored by the magistrate. A minor lexical error did not establish AI authorship. The court therefore refused to annul the decision on AI-use grounds.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies trial and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects trial with a recorded judicial or procedural response in TJ Parana. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
The appellant alleged the trial judge's sentence was entirely produced by artificial intelligence and should be annulled. The appellate court held the accusation required unequivocal proof and found none: any AI use was limited to drafting the procedural report and is authorized by Decreto Judiciário nº 421/2024/TJPR; the fundamentation and dispositive were authored by the magistrate. A minor lexical error did not establish AI authorship. The court therefore refused to annul the decision on AI-use grounds.
This matter connects trial with a recorded judicial or procedural response in TJ Parana. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Costarte Eireli Me. v. Churrascão Gaúcho Restaurante Ltda.?
- The appellant alleged the trial judge's sentence was entirely produced by artificial intelligence and should be annulled. The appellate court held the accusation required unequivocal proof and found none: any AI use was limited to drafting the procedural report and is authorized by Decreto Judiciário nº 421/2024/TJPR; the fundamentation and dispositive were authored by the magistrate. A minor lexical error did not establish AI authorship. The court therefore refused to annul the decision on AI-use grounds.
- Why does Costarte Eireli Me. v. Churrascão Gaúcho Restaurante Ltda. matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects trial with a recorded judicial or procedural response in TJ Parana. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Costarte Eireli Me. v. Churrascão Gaúcho Restaurante Ltda.?
- The record concerns a public allegation and does not establish an adjudicated finding. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Costarte Eireli Me. v. Churrascão Gaúcho Restaurante Ltda. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.