HomeCasesDanielle L. Neri v. Board of Education for Albuquerque Public Schools

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Danielle L. Neri v. Board of Education for Albuquerque Public Schools

D. New Mexico · May 7, 2026

NM / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationscivil rightstrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a nonexistent Tenth Circuit case 'United States v. Stone, 988 F.2d 1056, 1061 (10th Cir. 1993)'; Court found the citation fabricated and noted the correct existing case was Hall v. Western Production Co., 988 F.2d 1050 (10th Cir. 1993). Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Warning; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Centient AI with Warning in D. New Mexico, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Centient AI with Warning in D. New Mexico, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

New MexicoSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. New Mexico

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit10th Circuit

DateMay 7, 2026

AI toolCentient AI

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

Centient AI is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a nonexistent Tenth Circuit case 'United States v. Stone, 988 F.2d 1056, 1061 (10th Cir. 1993)'; Court found the citation fabricated and noted the correct existing case was Hall v. Western Production Co., 988 F.2d 1050 (10th Cir. 1993).
Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Doc. 255 contained multiple legal citations formatted as hyperlinks to Centient AI; Court noted these bore marks of artificial intelligence and cautioned they may produce fabricated or misleading authorities.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Danielle L. Neri v. Board of Education for Albuquerque Public Schools?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a nonexistent Tenth Circuit case 'United States v. Stone, 988 F.2d 1056, 1061 (10th Cir. 1993)'; Court found the citation fabricated and noted the correct existing case was Hall v. Western Production Co., 988 F.2d 1050 (10th Cir. 1993). Outcome: Warning.
Why does Danielle L. Neri v. Board of Education for Albuquerque Public Schools matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Centient AI with Warning in D. New Mexico, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Danielle L. Neri v. Board of Education for Albuquerque Public Schools?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Danielle L. Neri v. Board of Education for Albuquerque Public Schools summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Sample et al v. Hilton Worldwide Holdings, IncD. New Mexico · May 26, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Lowrey v. City of Rio Rancho et al. (2)D. New Mexico · May 21, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Lowrey v. City of Rio Rancho et al. (1)D. New Mexico · Nov 5, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Tomlin v. State of New MexicoD. New Mexico · Feb 1, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Carlos Maturin v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.D. New Mexico · Nov 25, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Clifford Robert Cummings v. The Estate of Forrest FennD. New Mexico · Oct 30, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Centient AI with Warning in D. New Mexico, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Doc. 255 contained multiple legal citations formatted as hyperlinks to Centient AI; Court noted these bore marks of artificial intelligence and cautioned they may produce fabricated or misleading authorities.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Danielle L. Neri v. Board of Education for Albuquerque Public Schools?

Why does Danielle L. Neri v. Board of Education for Albuquerque Public Schools matter for legal AI risk?

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Centient AI with Warning in D. New Mexico, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

What does the public record establish about Danielle L. Neri v. Board of Education for Albuquerque Public Schools?

Which source supports this Danielle L. Neri v. Board of Education for Albuquerque Public Schools summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.