HomeCasesDavis v. Marion County Juvenile Detention Center

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Davis v. Marion County Juvenile Detention Center

S.D. Indiana · May 20, 2026

IN / federalEditorial impact: mediumfake citationsfabricated quotescivil rightstrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Brief quoted a non-existent decision cited as Perry v. City of Indianapolis, No. 1:18-cv-02173-JRS-DLP, 2019 WL 2088435, at 2; court found the citation to be an amalgam of multiple cases and the 2019 WL cite actually corresponds to Rehal v. Weinstein (unrelated). Outcome: Monetary Sanction. Magistrate had suggested a higher sanction: see here.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Monetary Sanction; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving Fastcase with Monetary Sanction in S.D. Indiana, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving Fastcase with Monetary Sanction in S.D. Indiana, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

IndianaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtS.D. Indiana

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit7th Circuit

DateMay 20, 2026

AI toolFastcase

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeMonetary Sanction

Known amount$2,000

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

Fastcase is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Monetary Sanction

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Brief quoted a non-existent decision cited as Perry v. City of Indianapolis, No. 1:18-cv-02173-JRS-DLP, 2019 WL 2088435, at 2; court found the citation to be an amalgam of multiple cases and the 2019 WL cite actually corresponds to Rehal v. Weinstein (unrelated).
Fabricated: Case Law | Brief cited Berg v. Symons, 393 F. Supp. 2d 1215 (D. Minn. 2005) for a proposition about tax returns; court determined that citation does not exist and the similarly titled real opinion (393 F. Supp. 2d 525) does not support the quoted proposition.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Davis v. Marion County Juvenile Detention Center?: Fabricated: Case Law | Brief quoted a non-existent decision cited as Perry v. City of Indianapolis, No. 1:18-cv-02173-JRS-DLP, 2019 WL 2088435, at 2; court found the citation to be an amalgam of multiple cases and the 2019 WL cite actually corresponds to Rehal v. Weinstein (unrelated). Outcome: Monetary Sanction. Magistrate had suggested a higher sanction: see here.
Why does Davis v. Marion County Juvenile Detention Center matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving Fastcase with Monetary Sanction in S.D. Indiana, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Davis v. Marion County Juvenile Detention Center?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Davis v. Marion County Juvenile Detention Center summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

William C. Maxwell v. Dakota Michael & Chelsey SmithS.D. Indiana · May 26, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Philip D. Dennison v. June Caudill et al.S.D. Indiana · Apr 23, 2026same court · fake citations + civil rights Jana James v. National Board of Osteopathic Examiners, Inc.S.D. Indiana · Mar 19, 2026same court · fake citations + civil rights Michael Platt v. Volunteers of America Ohio & IndianaS.D. Indiana · Mar 10, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Cynthia White v. Walmart, Inc.S.D. Indiana · Apr 14, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Elbert Coleman, III; Elbert Coleman, IV v. Nexo Capital Inc.S.D. Indiana · Mar 31, 2026same court · fake citations + trial

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Brief cited Berg v. Symons, 393 F. Supp. 2d 1215 (D. Minn. 2005) for a proposition about tax returns; court determined that citation does not exist and the similarly titled real opinion (393 F. Supp. 2d 525) does not support the quoted proposition.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Davis v. Marion County Juvenile Detention Center?

Why does Davis v. Marion County Juvenile Detention Center matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Davis v. Marion County Juvenile Detention Center?

Which source supports this Davis v. Marion County Juvenile Detention Center summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.