Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
DeVore v. McCombie
N.D. Illinois · May 11, 2026
IL / federalEditorial impact: lowfake citationsmisrepresented authoritycivil rightstrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant cited a case the Court could not locate; the combination of case name and reporter citation appears non-existent. Outcome: Order to Explain.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Order to Explain; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to Explain in N.D. Illinois, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant cited a case the Court could not locate; the combination of case name and reporter citation appears non-existent. Outcome: Order to Explain.
Operational lesson
This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to Explain in N.D. Illinois, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
IllinoisSingle-state evidence scope
CourtN.D. Illinois
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit7th Circuit
DateMay 11, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeOrder to Explain
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Order to Explain
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant cited a case the Court could not locate; the combination of case name and reporter citation appears non-existent.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Defendant cited Alvarez v. City of Chicago with page cites (452–53) that do not exist; the opinion ends at page 451 and does not support the cited proposition per the Court.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in DeVore v. McCombie?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant cited a case the Court could not locate; the combination of case name and reporter citation appears non-existent. Outcome: Order to Explain.
- Why does DeVore v. McCombie matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to Explain in N.D. Illinois, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about DeVore v. McCombie?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this DeVore v. McCombie summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.