Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Donnie Yarn and Deshawn Murphy v. Trader Joe's
D. Oregon · Dec 5, 2025
OR / federalEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationscontracttrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited 'Miskew v. Hess, 211 Or. App. 499 (2007),' which the court found does not exist and noted may have been created by a generative AI tool; the citation prompted an order to show cause re sanctions. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.
- Why the court cared
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited 'Miskew v. Hess, 211 Or. App. 499 (2007),' which the court found does not exist and noted may have been created by a generative AI tool; the citation prompted an order to show cause re sanctions.
- Why it matters now
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Oregon, with the listed outcome: Order to Show Cause.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited 'Miskew v. Hess, 211 Or. App. 499 (2007),' which the court found does not exist and noted may have been created by a generative AI tool; the citation prompted an order to show cause re sanctions. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.
Operational lesson
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Oregon, with the listed outcome: Order to Show Cause.
Record details
OregonSingle-state evidence scope
CourtD. Oregon
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit9th Circuit
DateDec 5, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeOrder to Show Cause
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Order to Show Cause
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited 'Miskew v. Hess, 211 Or. App. 499 (2007),' which the court found does not exist and noted may have been created by a generative AI tool; the citation prompted an order to show cause re sanctions.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Donnie Yarn and Deshawn Murphy v. Trader Joe's?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited 'Miskew v. Hess, 211 Or. App. 499 (2007),' which the court found does not exist and noted may have been created by a generative AI tool; the citation prompted an order to show cause re sanctions. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.
- Why does Donnie Yarn and Deshawn Murphy v. Trader Joe's matter for legal AI risk?
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Oregon, with the listed outcome: Order to Show Cause.
- What does the public record establish about Donnie Yarn and Deshawn Murphy v. Trader Joe's?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this Donnie Yarn and Deshawn Murphy v. Trader Joe's summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.