AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Nov 3, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 29, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesQuzack-White et al. v. Avanath Largo Center, LLC
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Quzack-White et al. v. Avanath Largo Center, LLC

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0), which credits Mary Matuszak; document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

Cite this record

D. Maryland · Oct 27, 2026

MD / federalEditorial impact: mediumfake citationsfabricated quotescivil rightstrialOrdered To Show CauseStruck Filing
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | The Court stated that Plaintiffs’ original filings contained hallucinated case citations and inaccurate case quotations, but the decision did not identify the individual citations or quotations. Outcome: Brief Struck; Order to Show Cause.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Brief Struck; Order to Show Cause. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Brief Struck; Order to Show Cause in D. Maryland. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | The Court stated that Plaintiffs’ original filings contained hallucinated case citations and inaccurate case quotations, but the decision did not identify the individual citations or quotations. Outcome: Brief Struck; Order to Show Cause.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Brief Struck; Order to Show Cause in D. Maryland. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

MarylandSingle-state evidence scope
Explore MDOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtD. Maryland
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit4th Circuit
DateOct 27, 2026
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeBrief Struck; Order to Show Cause
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Brief Struck; Order to Show Cause

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | The Court stated that Plaintiffs’ original filings contained hallucinated case citations and inaccurate case quotations, but the decision did not identify the individual citations or quotations.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Quzack-White et al. v. Avanath Largo Center, LLC?
Fabricated: Case Law | The Court stated that Plaintiffs’ original filings contained hallucinated case citations and inaccurate case quotations, but the decision did not identify the individual citations or quotations. Outcome: Brief Struck; Order to Show Cause.
Why does Quzack-White et al. v. Avanath Largo Center, LLC matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Brief Struck; Order to Show Cause in D. Maryland. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Quzack-White et al. v. Avanath Largo Center, LLC?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Quzack-White et al. v. Avanath Largo Center, LLC summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Abybatou Mbow v. Officer Michael Mackert et al. (1)D. Maryland · Jan 28, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesNeal v. FrayerD. Maryland · Nov 17, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesAbybatou Mbow v. Officer Michael Mackert et al. (2)D. Maryland · Jul 17, 2026same court · fake citations + civil rightsDevin A. Robinson v. Velosio, LLCD. Maryland · May 4, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesTaylor v. Prince George’s County, MarylandD. Maryland · Dec 16, 2025same court · fabricated quotes + civil rightsUnited States v. MalikD. Maryland · Sep 19, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes
Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Before the next filing goes out, review the workflow behind it.

These records show where AI-assisted filings went wrong. AI Vortex works with law firms and legal teams on one AI-assisted workflow at a time: who reviews the output, who signs, and what source trail it leaves. Operations design, not legal advice.

Review a workflow