Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2025:9423
Gelderland · Nov 6, 2025
NetherlandsEditorial impact: lowfake citationsmisrepresented authorityadministrativetrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's counsel cited several CRvB rulings with ECLI numbers that the court could not locate; some cited statements appear not to exist and were therefore rejected. Outcome: Court found several cited rulings non-existent or irrelevant, rejected reliance on that case law, and dismissed the appeal..
- Why the court cared
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's counsel cited several CRvB rulings with ECLI numbers that the court could not locate; some cited statements appear not to exist and were therefore rejected. || Misrepresented: Case Law | ECLI numbers that the court located corresponded to topics irrelevant to the Participation Act argument; the cited case law was misrepresented and not relevant.
- Why it matters now
- Dismissal can follow from bad citations alone; the merits never get reached if the authorities are fictitious.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's counsel cited several CRvB rulings with ECLI numbers that the court could not locate; some cited statements appear not to exist and were therefore rejected. Outcome: Court found several cited rulings non-existent or irrelevant, rejected reliance on that case law, and dismissed the appeal..
Operational lesson
Dismissal can follow from bad citations alone; the merits never get reached if the authorities are fictitious.
Record details
CourtGelderland
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateNov 6, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeCourt found several cited rulings non-existent or irrelevant, rejected reliance on that case law, and dismissed the appeal.
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Court found several cited rulings non-existent or irrelevant, rejected reliance on that case law, and dismissed the appeal.
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's counsel cited several CRvB rulings with ECLI numbers that the court could not locate; some cited statements appear not to exist and were therefore rejected.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | ECLI numbers that the court located corresponded to topics irrelevant to the Participation Act argument; the cited case law was misrepresented and not relevant.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2025:9423?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's counsel cited several CRvB rulings with ECLI numbers that the court could not locate; some cited statements appear not to exist and were therefore rejected. Outcome: Court found several cited rulings non-existent or irrelevant, rejected reliance on that case law, and dismissed the appeal..
- Why does ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2025:9423 matter for legal AI risk?
- Dismissal can follow from bad citations alone; the merits never get reached if the authorities are fictitious.
- What does the public record establish about ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2025:9423?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2025:9423 summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.