HomeCasesEddie Lawrence Quitugua v. Donna P. Quitugua, et al.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Eddie Lawrence Quitugua v. Donna P. Quitugua, et al.

D. Guam · Dec 3, 2025

GU / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsfabricated quotescivil rights

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not locate the cited decision and suspects this cited authority may be an AI-fabricated case; flagged as potentially fabricated citation. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not locate the cited decision and suspects this cited authority may be an AI-fabricated case; flagged as potentially fabricated citation. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a quotation to Henrichs that does not appear in the opinion; court found the quoted language absent from the decision. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff claimed Kougasian contained a specific phrasing ('gravamen') that the opinion does not contain; court identified the quotation as inaccurate. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted Leadsinger for a proposition about continuing violations using wording that does not appear in the opinion; court noted the quoted terms are absent.
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Guam, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not locate the cited decision and suspects this cited authority may be an AI-fabricated case; flagged as potentially fabricated citation. Outcome: Warning.

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Guam, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Record details

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Guam

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateDec 3, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not locate the cited decision and suspects this cited authority may be an AI-fabricated case; flagged as potentially fabricated citation.
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a quotation to Henrichs that does not appear in the opinion; court found the quoted language absent from the decision.
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff claimed Kougasian contained a specific phrasing ('gravamen') that the opinion does not contain; court identified the quotation as inaccurate.
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted Leadsinger for a proposition about continuing violations using wording that does not appear in the opinion; court noted the quoted terms are absent.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Eddie Lawrence Quitugua v. Donna P. Quitugua, et al.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not locate the cited decision and suspects this cited authority may be an AI-fabricated case; flagged as potentially fabricated citation. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Eddie Lawrence Quitugua v. Donna P. Quitugua, et al. matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Guam, with the listed outcome: Warning.
What does the public record establish about Eddie Lawrence Quitugua v. Donna P. Quitugua, et al.?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Eddie Lawrence Quitugua v. Donna P. Quitugua, et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Allahgehovah Jones v. City of Moore, et al.W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 24, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Jonathan David Deak v. Mike Schuitema, et al.W.D. Michigan · Jun 18, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Ifeoma Delliane Chinedu Obi v. Cook County, Illinois, et al. (2)N.D. Illinois · Jun 10, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Patrick C. Shaltry v. Donna Collins, et al.E.D. Michigan · Jun 2, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Sample et al v. Hilton Worldwide Holdings, IncD. New Mexico · May 26, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)William C. Maxwell v. Dakota Michael & Chelsey SmithS.D. Indiana · May 26, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not locate the cited decision and suspects this cited authority may be an AI-fabricated case; flagged as potentially fabricated citation. Outcome: Warning.

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Guam, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not locate the cited decision and suspects this cited authority may be an AI-fabricated case; flagged as potentially fabricated citation.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a quotation to Henrichs that does not appear in the opinion; court found the quoted language absent from the decision.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff claimed Kougasian contained a specific phrasing ('gravamen') that the opinion does not contain; court identified the quotation as inaccurate.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted Leadsinger for a proposition about continuing violations using wording that does not appear in the opinion; court noted the quoted terms are absent.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Eddie Lawrence Quitugua v. Donna P. Quitugua, et al.?

Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not locate the cited decision and suspects this cited authority may be an AI-fabricated case; flagged as potentially fabricated citation. Outcome: Warning.

Why does Eddie Lawrence Quitugua v. Donna P. Quitugua, et al. matter for legal AI risk?

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Guam, with the listed outcome: Warning.

What does the public record establish about Eddie Lawrence Quitugua v. Donna P. Quitugua, et al.?

Which source supports this Eddie Lawrence Quitugua v. Donna P. Quitugua, et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.