HomeCasesAllahgehovah Jones v. City of Moore, et al.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 76/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Allahgehovah Jones v. City of Moore, et al.

W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 24, 2026

OK / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsfabricated quotescivil rights

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Ass'n, 677 F. Supp. 2d 63 (D.D.C. 2009), which the Court found does not correspond to any legitimate case.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is the response recorded in the linked source; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with a recorded judicial response in W.D. Oklahoma, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Ass'n, 677 F. Supp. 2d 63 (D.D.C. 2009), which the Court found does not correspond to any legitimate case.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with a recorded judicial response in W.D. Oklahoma, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

OklahomaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtW.D. Oklahoma

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit10th Circuit

DateJun 24, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Ass'n, 677 F. Supp. 2d 63 (D.D.C. 2009), which the Court found does not correspond to any legitimate case.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Van Scoy v. Process Control Corp., 113 F.3d 891 (8th Cir. 1997), which the Court found to be a non-existent/incorrect citation.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Cok v. Family Dollar Stores of Ind., L.P., 2013 WL 1187553 (N.D. Ind. Mar. 21, 2013), which the Court determined did not correspond to a legitimate case as cited.
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed the quote 'Officers who lie … are not entitled to qualified immunity' to Robison v. Via, but the Court found Robison did not contain that statement.
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff included several other direct quotes (e.g., 'misleading characterizations of the record … constitute sanctionable conduct'; 'deliberate attempts to exploit a litigant’s disabilities constitute bad faith') that the Court found to be fabricated or untraceable to the cited authorities.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Allahgehovah Jones v. City of Moore, et al.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Ass'n, 677 F. Supp. 2d 63 (D.D.C. 2009), which the Court found does not correspond to any legitimate case.
Why does Allahgehovah Jones v. City of Moore, et al. matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with a recorded judicial response in W.D. Oklahoma, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Allahgehovah Jones v. City of Moore, et al.?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Allahgehovah Jones v. City of Moore, et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Dalton Gage Hill v. Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority (2)W.D. Oklahoma · May 21, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Blackburn v. United StatesW.D. Oklahoma · Apr 7, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Dewayne Clark v. CoreCivicW.D. Oklahoma · Mar 6, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Jane Doe 1, et al. v. Mount Saint Mary High School CorporationW.D. Oklahoma · May 13, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Dillon v. Myles Stephenson, et al.W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 11, 2026same court · fake citations + civil rights Zaykariya v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation, et al.W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 9, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Ass'n, 677 F. Supp. 2d 63 (D.D.C. 2009), which the Court found does not correspond to any legitimate case.

Operational lesson

Record details

OklahomaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtW.D. Oklahoma

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit10th Circuit

DateJun 24, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Ass'n, 677 F. Supp. 2d 63 (D.D.C. 2009), which the Court found does not correspond to any legitimate case.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Van Scoy v. Process Control Corp., 113 F.3d 891 (8th Cir. 1997), which the Court found to be a non-existent/incorrect citation.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Cok v. Family Dollar Stores of Ind., L.P., 2013 WL 1187553 (N.D. Ind. Mar. 21, 2013), which the Court determined did not correspond to a legitimate case as cited.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed the quote 'Officers who lie … are not entitled to qualified immunity' to Robison v. Via, but the Court found Robison did not contain that statement.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff included several other direct quotes (e.g., 'misleading characterizations of the record … constitute sanctionable conduct'; 'deliberate attempts to exploit a litigant’s disabilities constitute bad faith') that the Court found to be fabricated or untraceable to the cited authorities.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Allahgehovah Jones v. City of Moore, et al.?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Ass'n, 677 F. Supp. 2d 63 (D.D.C. 2009), which the Court found does not correspond to any legitimate case.

Why does Allahgehovah Jones v. City of Moore, et al. matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Allahgehovah Jones v. City of Moore, et al.?

Which source supports this Allahgehovah Jones v. City of Moore, et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.