HomeCasesEmmanuel S. Yirenkyi v. Angela Hoover

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 80/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Emmanuel S. Yirenkyi v. Angela Hoover

M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 2, 2026

PA / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsimmigrationtrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioner cited 'Frederick v. Warden, 2019 WL 1318445 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 22, 2019)' to support that 8–10 months detention requires release; court found no such Middle District of Pennsylvania decision and labeled it an AI-generated legal hallucination.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioner cited 'Frederick v. Warden, 2019 WL 1318445 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 22, 2019)' to support that 8–10 months detention requires release; court found no such Middle District of Pennsylvania decision and labeled it an AI-generated legal hallucination. || Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioner cited 'Rodriquez v. Lowe, 2018 WL 683974 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 2, 2018)'; the court found the provided Westlaw citation redirected to an unrelated Quebec family-court decision and concluded no such M.D. Pa. case exists, calling it a legal hallucination.
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Pennsylvania, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Pennsylvania, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

Record details

PennsylvaniaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtM.D. Pennsylvania

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit3rd Circuit

DateFeb 2, 2026

AI toolUnidentified

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioner cited 'Frederick v. Warden, 2019 WL 1318445 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 22, 2019)' to support that 8–10 months detention requires release; court found no such Middle District of Pennsylvania decision and labeled it an AI-generated legal hallucination.
Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioner cited 'Rodriquez v. Lowe, 2018 WL 683974 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 2, 2018)'; the court found the provided Westlaw citation redirected to an unrelated Quebec family-court decision and concluded no such M.D. Pa. case exists, calling it a legal hallucination.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Emmanuel S. Yirenkyi v. Angela Hoover?: Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioner cited 'Frederick v. Warden, 2019 WL 1318445 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 22, 2019)' to support that 8–10 months detention requires release; court found no such Middle District of Pennsylvania decision and labeled it an AI-generated legal hallucination.
Why does Emmanuel S. Yirenkyi v. Angela Hoover matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Pennsylvania, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
What does the public record establish about Emmanuel S. Yirenkyi v. Angela Hoover?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Emmanuel S. Yirenkyi v. Angela Hoover summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Marble v. O'MalleyM.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 27, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Lonnie Allbaugh v. University of ScrantonM.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 28, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Birsingh v. Little Wheel, LLC, et al.M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 10, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Trauger v. Columbia County District Attorney's Office et al.M.D. Pennsylvania · May 29, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Domingo Beato-Estrella v. M. ArvizaM.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Victor Kholod v. Nationstar Mortgage LLCM.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 22, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Pennsylvania, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

Record details

PennsylvaniaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtM.D. Pennsylvania

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit3rd Circuit

DateFeb 2, 2026

AI toolUnidentified

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Petitioner cited 'Rodriquez v. Lowe, 2018 WL 683974 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 2, 2018)'; the court found the provided Westlaw citation redirected to an unrelated Quebec family-court decision and concluded no such M.D. Pa. case exists, calling it a legal hallucination.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Emmanuel S. Yirenkyi v. Angela Hoover?

Why does Emmanuel S. Yirenkyi v. Angela Hoover matter for legal AI risk?

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Pennsylvania, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

What does the public record establish about Emmanuel S. Yirenkyi v. Angela Hoover?

Which source supports this Emmanuel S. Yirenkyi v. Angela Hoover summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.