Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Lonnie Allbaugh v. University of Scranton
M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 28, 2025
PA / federalEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationsfabricated quotesemployment
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Quoted language allegedly from the cited case—"We do not require a plaintiff to plead a prima facie case of discrimination to survive a motion to dismiss."—which does not appear in the actual case plaintiff said he meant Outcome: Monetary sanction; complaint dismissed without prejudice; leave to amend granted.. The court later declined to reconsider its sanction (see here).
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Monetary sanction; complaint dismissed without prejudice; leave to amend granted.; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Monetary sanction; complaint dismissed without prejudice; leave to amend granted. in M.D. Pennsylvania, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Quoted language allegedly from the cited case—"We do not require a plaintiff to plead a prima facie case of discrimination to survive a motion to dismiss."—which does not appear in the actual case plaintiff said he meant Outcome: Monetary sanction; complaint dismissed without prejudice; leave to amend granted.. The court later declined to reconsider its sanction (see here).
Operational lesson
This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Monetary sanction; complaint dismissed without prejudice; leave to amend granted. in M.D. Pennsylvania, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
PennsylvaniaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtM.D. Pennsylvania
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit3rd Circuit
DateAug 28, 2025
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeMonetary sanction; complaint dismissed without prejudice; leave to amend granted.
Known amount$1,000
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
not established
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Procedural posture
Monetary sanction; complaint dismissed without prejudice; leave to amend granted.
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Quoted language allegedly from the cited case—"We do not require a plaintiff to plead a prima facie case of discrimination to survive a motion to dismiss."—which does not appear in the actual case plaintiff said he meant
- Fabricated: Case Law | Submitted a non-existent Third Circuit case as authority; opposing party and court could not locate the opinion and plaintiff later admitted the citation was AI-generated.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Lonnie Allbaugh v. University of Scranton?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Quoted language allegedly from the cited case—"We do not require a plaintiff to plead a prima facie case of discrimination to survive a motion to dismiss."—which does not appear in the actual case plaintiff said he meant Outcome: Monetary sanction; complaint dismissed without prejudice; leave to amend granted.. The court later declined to reconsider its sanction (see here).
- Why does Lonnie Allbaugh v. University of Scranton matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Monetary sanction; complaint dismissed without prejudice; leave to amend granted. in M.D. Pennsylvania, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Lonnie Allbaugh v. University of Scranton?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Lonnie Allbaugh v. University of Scranton summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.