Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Krista C. Geddes v. LoanCare, LLC, et al.
E.D. California · Apr 22, 2026
CA / federalEditorial impact: highfake citationsfabricated quotesbar referralcontract
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
False Quotes: Case Law | Court found plaintiff misquoted and enlarged the scope of Kachlon; the quoted language does not appear in the opinion and was used to support removing nominal status for trustees. Outcome: Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- A $1K fine plus bar referral is the new floor for fake quotes; verify every quotation against the primary source.
Why this matter is tracked
False Quotes: Case Law | Court found plaintiff misquoted and enlarged the scope of Kachlon; the quoted language does not appear in the opinion and was used to support removing nominal status for trustees. Outcome: Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral.
Operational lesson
A $1K fine plus bar referral is the new floor for fake quotes; verify every quotation against the primary source.
Record details
CaliforniaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtE.D. California
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit9th Circuit
DateApr 22, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeMonetary Sanction; Bar Referral
Known amount$1,000
Professional sanctionYes
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Court found plaintiff misquoted and enlarged the scope of Kachlon; the quoted language does not appear in the opinion and was used to support removing nominal status for trustees.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Court found the Barrionuevo quotation was nonexistent or unrelated to the cited opinion; Barrionuevo addresses the tender rule and does not discuss nominal party status.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Krista C. Geddes v. LoanCare, LLC, et al.?
- False Quotes: Case Law | Court found plaintiff misquoted and enlarged the scope of Kachlon; the quoted language does not appear in the opinion and was used to support removing nominal status for trustees. Outcome: Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral.
- Why does Krista C. Geddes v. LoanCare, LLC, et al. matter for legal AI risk?
- A $1K fine plus bar referral is the new floor for fake quotes; verify every quotation against the primary source.
- What does the public record establish about Krista C. Geddes v. LoanCare, LLC, et al.?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Krista C. Geddes v. LoanCare, LLC, et al. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.