Public trackerCorpus refreshed Aug 17, 2026 · Latest decision Aug 13, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesPetry v. Evanlux Esquadrias Ltda.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Petry v. Evanlux Esquadrias Ltda.

TJ Parana · Jun 24, 2025

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Agravantes cited precedents that were not found in the TJPR database; court determined these were invented by an AI tool and thus non-existent jurisprudence. Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fake citations and bar referral and records Monetary Fine; Bar Referral. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in TJ Parana. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Agravantes cited precedents that were not found in the TJPR database; court determined these were invented by an AI tool and thus non-existent jurisprudence. Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in TJ Parana. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtTJ Parana
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateJun 24, 2025
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeMonetary Fine; Bar Referral
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionYes
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Monetary Fine; Bar Referral

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Agravantes cited precedents that were not found in the TJPR database; court determined these were invented by an AI tool and thus non-existent jurisprudence.
  2. Fabricated: Case Law | Court cited other decisions documenting AI-created fictitious judgments (invented judges and bogus process numbers) as comparable examples.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Petry v. Evanlux Esquadrias Ltda.?
Fabricated: Case Law | Agravantes cited precedents that were not found in the TJPR database; court determined these were invented by an AI tool and thus non-existent jurisprudence. Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral.
Why does Petry v. Evanlux Esquadrias Ltda. matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in TJ Parana. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Petry v. Evanlux Esquadrias Ltda.?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Petry v. Evanlux Esquadrias Ltda. summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.