HomeCasesGarcia v. City of Monte Vista, Colorado et al

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Garcia v. City of Monte Vista, Colorado et al

D. Colorado · May 29, 2026

CO / federalEditorial impact: mediumfake citationsfabricated quotescivil rightstrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

False Quotes: Case Law | The Court found that counsel included a quotation purportedly from Miller v. Spiers that does not exist in the opinion and noted the citation appears to be fabricated. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Order to Show Cause; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to Show Cause in D. Colorado, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to Show Cause in D. Colorado, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

ColoradoSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Colorado

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit10th Circuit

DateMay 29, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeOrder to Show Cause

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Order to Show Cause

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Case Law | The Court found that counsel included a quotation purportedly from Miller v. Spiers that does not exist in the opinion and noted the citation appears to be fabricated.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Garcia v. City of Monte Vista, Colorado et al?: False Quotes: Case Law | The Court found that counsel included a quotation purportedly from Miller v. Spiers that does not exist in the opinion and noted the citation appears to be fabricated. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.
Why does Garcia v. City of Monte Vista, Colorado et al matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to Show Cause in D. Colorado, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Garcia v. City of Monte Vista, Colorado et al?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Garcia v. City of Monte Vista, Colorado et al summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Labonte v. Bokf, et al.D. Colorado · Feb 10, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Alzado-Lotz v. BockD. Colorado · Jan 16, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Harris v. Take-Two Interactive SoftwareD. Colorado · May 6, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Hanson v. Nest Home Lending, LLC et al.D. Colorado · Nov 28, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Coomer v. Lindell/MyPillow, Inc. (1)D. Colorado · Jul 7, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Y.S. v. John Doe, et al.D. Colorado · Jun 4, 2026same court · fake citations + trial

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Record details

ColoradoSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Colorado

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit10th Circuit

DateMay 29, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeOrder to Show Cause

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Questions this record answers

What happened in Garcia v. City of Monte Vista, Colorado et al?

Why does Garcia v. City of Monte Vista, Colorado et al matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Garcia v. City of Monte Vista, Colorado et al?

Which source supports this Garcia v. City of Monte Vista, Colorado et al summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.